Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40648421›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Comprehensive Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Computer Vision.

Zhihan Cheng, Yue Wu, Yule Li, Lingfeng Cai, Baha Ihnaini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhihan ChengDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, Mathematics and Technology, Wenzhou-Kean University, Wenzhou 325060, China.ORCID 0009-0008-9498-1247
Yue WuDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, Mathematics and Technology, Wenzhou-Kean University, Wenzhou 325060, China.ORCID 0009-0007-8162-6425
Yule LiDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Science, Mathematics and Technology, Wenzhou-Kean University, Wenzhou 325060, China.ORCID 0009-0007-3119-7001
Lingfeng CaiDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, Mathematics and Technology, Wenzhou-Kean University, Wenzhou 325060, China.ORCID 0009-0008-7773-4893
Baha IhnainiDepartment of Computer Sciences, College of Science, Mathematics and Technology, Wenzhou-Kean University, Wenzhou 325060, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2109-4793

Funding

Wenzhou-Kean University IRSPK2023005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is increasingly important in computer vision, aiming to connect complex model outputs with human understanding. This review provides a focused comparative analysis of representative XAI methods in four main categories, attribution-based, activation-based, perturbation-based, and transformer-based approaches, selected from a broader literature landscape. Attribution-based methods like Grad-CAM highlight key input regions using gradients and feature activation. Activation-based methods analyze the responses of internal neurons or feature maps to identify which parts of the input activate specific layers or units, helping to reveal hierarchical feature representations. Perturbation-based techniques, such as RISE, assess feature importance through input modifications without accessing internal model details. Transformer-based methods, which use self-attention, offer global interpretability by tracing information flow across layers. We evaluate these methods using metrics such as faithfulness, localization accuracy, efficiency, and overlap with medical annotations. We also propose a hierarchical taxonomy to classify these methods, reflecting the diversity of XAI techniques. Results show that RISE has the highest faithfulness but is computationally expensive, limiting its use in real-time scenarios. Transformer-based methods perform well in medical imaging, with high IoU scores, though interpreting attention maps requires care. These findings emphasize the need for context-aware evaluation and hybrid XAI methods balancing interpretability and efficiency. The review ends by discussing ethical and practical challenges, stressing the need for standard benchmarks and domain-specific tuning.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, Computercomputer vision (CV)explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)Grad-CAMhybrid interpretability frameworksimage understanding (IU)RISEtransformer-based XAI

Identifiers

PMID40648421
PMCPMC12252469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.