ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
A Comprehensive Review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Computer Vision.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment from Retinal Fundus Images Using a CSP-ConvNext Model.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable AI for chest radiographs: sex-stratified fairness auditing in CNN-based pneumonia detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Critical Care Nursing: A Discussion Paper.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- A transformer-based multimodal deep learning model for preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression level in glioma.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Discontinuation Effects (AI-DICE): An Emerging Phenomenon in Mental Health Applications.JMIR AI · 2026Article
- Harnessing Deep Learning Models for Guide RNA Optimization and Off-Target Prediction in CRISPR Systems.Biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- A Comparative Analysis of Explainable AI (XAI) Techniques for Transparent and Reliable Image Classification.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- A Lightweight and Explainable AI Framework Toward Automated Infraocclusion Detection in Pediatric Panoramic Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-Source Diagnosis of Bearing Faults Using Interpretable Boosted Trees.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-Based Methods in Neuropathology for Diagnosis and Treatment of Brain Tumors.European journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Who's afraid of synthetic data? Hybrid approaches to deliver medical digital twins.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2026Article
- The SHAP Explainer Model for Binary Classifiers Detecting Functional Groups in Molecules Based on FTIR Spectra.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Estimating Fibrosity Scores of Plant-Based Meat Products from Images: A Deep Neural Network Approach.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- MDEB-YOLO: A Lightweight Multi-Scale Attention Network for Micro-Defect Detection on Printed Circuit Boards.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Understanding systemic barriers to AI-human collaboration integration for quality improvement in public health systems: a fuzzy DEMATEL analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- An interpretable multimodal ensemble assessment framework for Alzheimer's disease cognitive staging.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Decoding the "black-box": explainable artificial intelligence towards trustworthy advancement in respiratory medicine.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- AI-Powered Predictive Models in Implant Dentistry: Planning, Risk Assessment, and Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven anticancer peptide discovery.iMetaOmics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is increasingly important in computer vision, aiming to connect complex model outputs with human understanding. This review provides a focused comparative analysis of representative XAI methods in four main categories, attribution-based, activation-based, perturbation-based, and transformer-based approaches, selected from a broader literature landscape. Attribution-based methods like Grad-CAM highlight key input regions using gradients and feature activation. Activation-based methods analyze the responses of internal neurons or feature maps to identify which parts of the input activate specific layers or units, helping to reveal hierarchical feature representations. Perturbation-based techniques, such as RISE, assess feature importance through input modifications without accessing internal model details. Transformer-based methods, which use self-attention, offer global interpretability by tracing information flow across layers. We evaluate these methods using metrics such as faithfulness, localization accuracy, efficiency, and overlap with medical annotations. We also propose a hierarchical taxonomy to classify these methods, reflecting the diversity of XAI techniques. Results show that RISE has the highest faithfulness but is computationally expensive, limiting its use in real-time scenarios. Transformer-based methods perform well in medical imaging, with high IoU scores, though interpreting attention maps requires care. These findings emphasize the need for context-aware evaluation and hybrid XAI methods balancing interpretability and efficiency. The review ends by discussing ethical and practical challenges, stressing the need for standard benchmarks and domain-specific tuning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.