Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40648362›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Towards Explainable Graph Embeddings for Gait Assessment Using Per-Cluster Dimensional Weighting.

Chris Lochhead, Robert B Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chris LochheadUniversity of Edinburgh, Old College, South Bridge, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9046-6784
Robert B FisherUniversity of Edinburgh, Old College, South Bridge, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6860-9371

Funding

Legal & General Plc n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As gaitpathology assessment systems improve both in accuracy and efficiency, the prospect of using these systems in real healthcare applications is becoming more realistic. Although gait analysis systems have proven capable of detecting gait abnormalities in supervised tasks in laboratories and clinics, there is comparatively little investigation into making such systems explainable to healthcare professionals who would use gait analysis in practice in home-based settings. There is a "black box" problem with existing machine learning models, where healthcare professionals are expected to "trust" the model making diagnoses without understanding its underlying reasoning. To address this applicational barrier, an end-to-end pipeline is introduced here for creating graph feature embeddings, generated using a bespoke Spatio-temporal Graph Convolutional Network and per-joint Principal Component Analysis. The latent graph embeddings produced by this framework led to a novel semi-supervised weighting function which quantifies and ranks the most important joint features, which are used to provide a description for each pathology. Using these embeddings with a K-means clustering approach, the proposed method also outperforms the state of the art by between 4.53 and 16% in classification accuracy across three datasets with a total of 14 different simulated gait pathologies from minor limping to ataxic gait. The resulting system provides a workable improvement to at-home gait assessment applications by providing accurate and explainable descriptions of the nature of detected gait abnormalities without need of prior labeled descriptions of detected pathologies.

Indexed as

GaitGait AnalysisAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisHumansMachine LearningPrincipal Component Analysiscomputer visiongait assessmentgraph networksolder adult care

Identifiers

PMID40648362
PMCPMC12252051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.