ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Deep Metric Learning-Based Classification for Pavement Distress Images.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a deep metric learning-based pavement distress classification method to address critical limitations in conventional approaches, including their dependency on large training datasets and inability to incrementally learn new categories. To resolve high intra-class variance and low inter-class distinction in distress images, we design a CNN head with multi-cluster centroins trained via SoftTriple loss, simultaneously maximizing inter-class separation while establishing multiple intra-class centers. An adaptive weighting strategy combining sample similarity and class priors mitigates data imbalance, while soft-label techniques reduce labeling noise by evaluating similarity against support-set exemplars. Evaluations on the UAV-PDD2023 dataset demonstrate superior performance-3.2% higher macro-recall than supervised learning, and 6.7%/8.5% improvements in macro-F1/weighted-F1 over iCaRL incremental learning-validating the method's effectiveness for real-world road inspection scenarios with evolving distress types and limited annotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.