ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
An Interpretability Method for Broken Wire Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As an indispensable piece of production equipment in the industrial field, wire rope is directly related to personnel safety and the normal operation of equipment. Therefore, it is necessary to perform broken wire detection. Deep learning has powerful feature-learning capabilities and is characterized by high accuracy and efficiency, and the YOLOv8 object detection model has been adopted to detect wire breaks in electromagnetic signal images of wire rope, achieving better results. Nevertheless, the black box problem of the model brings a new trust challenge, and it is difficult to determine the correctness of the model's decision and whether it has any potential problems, so an interpretability study needed to be carried out. In this work, a perturbation-based interpretability method-ESTC (Eliminating Splicing and Truncation Compensation)-is proposed, which distinguishes itself from other methods of the same type by targeting the signaling object instead of the ordinary object. ESTC is compared with other model-agnostic interpretable methods, LIME, RISE, and D-RISE, using the same model on the same test set. The results indicate that our proposed method is objectively superior to the others, and the interpretability analysis shows that the model predicts in a way that is consistent with the priori knowledge of the manual rope inspection. This not only increases the credibility of using the object detection model for broken wire detection but also has important implications for the practical application of using object detection model to detect wire breaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.