ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Does a SPR-Based Cell-Based Assay Provide Reliable Results on the Toxicity and Efficacy of Antiviral Drugs?
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SPR Sensing: From Biomolecular Interactions to Cell-Based Analysis.Biosensors · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
SPR has been recently established as a powerful tool for studying various cellular processes in real time and without the use of labeling agents. So far, all studies in this area have been performed using the Kretschmann method for SPR excitation. In our studies, we used grating-based SPR. Here, we investigated the feasibility of this approach in a cell-based assay applied for antiviral drug screening. It was found that the continuous-flow SPR detection used in the conventional SPR can be replaced by sequential signal measurements of SPR slides removed from the medium at fixed hours after seeding. A protocol ensuring correct measurements was established. SPR detection was performed up to 48 h after seeding the VERO E6 cell line in three experiments, in which the cells were (i) compound-untreated, (ii) compound-treated, and (iii) infected with human coronavirus type 229E and compound-treated. Therefore, the temporal variation in the SPR signal was determined, induced by the cell coverage on the slide, the compound toxicity, and its antiviral action. MTT analysis and microscopic observations were used as reference methods. The remarkable agreement found in the results of SPR detection proved the effectiveness and reliability of grating-based SPR applied in cell-based assays.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.