ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Emerging Frontiers in Robotic Upper-Limb Prostheses: Mechanisms, Materials, Tactile Sensors and Machine Learning-Based EMG Control: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncertainty-Aware Probabilistic Fusion Post-Processing for Continuous Wrist Motion Estimation in Myoelectric Control.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multi-Level Perception Systems in Fusion of Lifeforms: Classification, Challenges and Future Conceptions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Analysis of Surface EMG Signals to Control of a Bionic Hand Prototype with Its Implementation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hands are central to nearly every aspect of daily life, so losing an upper limb due to amputation can severely affect a person's independence. Robotic prostheses offer a promising solution by mimicking many of the functions of a natural arm, leading to an increasing need for advanced prosthetic designs. However, developing an effective robotic hand prosthesis is far from straightforward. It involves several critical steps, including creating accurate models, choosing materials that balance biocompatibility with durability, integrating electronic and sensory components, and perfecting control systems before final production. A key factor in ensuring smooth, natural movements lies in the method of control. One popular approach is to use electromyography (EMG), which relies on electrical signals from the user's remaining muscle activity to direct the prosthesis. By decoding these signals, we can predict the intended hand and arm motions and translate them into real-time actions. Recent strides in machine learning have made EMG-based control more adaptable, offering users a more intuitive experience. Alongside this, researchers are exploring tactile sensors for enhanced feedback, materials resilient in harsh conditions, and mechanical designs that better replicate the intricacies of a biological limb. This review brings together these advancements, focusing on emerging trends and future directions in robotic upper-limb prosthesis development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.