Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40648148›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Emerging Frontiers in Robotic Upper-Limb Prostheses: Mechanisms, Materials, Tactile Sensors and Machine Learning-Based EMG Control: A Comprehensive Review.

Beibit Abdikenov, Darkhan Zholtayev, Kanat Suleimenov, Nazgul Assan, Kassymbek Ozhikenov, Aiman Ozhikenova, Nurbek Nadirov, Akim Kapsalyamov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Beibit AbdikenovScience and Innovation Center "Artificial Intelligence", Astana IT University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Darkhan ZholtayevScience and Innovation Center "Artificial Intelligence", Astana IT University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Kanat SuleimenovReLive Research, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Nazgul AssanReLive Research, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-0662-7130
Kassymbek OzhikenovInstitute of Automation and Information Technologies, Satbayev University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.
Aiman OzhikenovaInstitute of Automation and Information Technologies, Satbayev University, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan.
Nurbek NadirovReLive Research, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.
Akim KapsalyamovFaculty of Engineering and Mathematics, Hochschule Bielefeld, 33619 Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3700-6214

Funding

Committee of Science of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan BR24992820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hands are central to nearly every aspect of daily life, so losing an upper limb due to amputation can severely affect a person's independence. Robotic prostheses offer a promising solution by mimicking many of the functions of a natural arm, leading to an increasing need for advanced prosthetic designs. However, developing an effective robotic hand prosthesis is far from straightforward. It involves several critical steps, including creating accurate models, choosing materials that balance biocompatibility with durability, integrating electronic and sensory components, and perfecting control systems before final production. A key factor in ensuring smooth, natural movements lies in the method of control. One popular approach is to use electromyography (EMG), which relies on electrical signals from the user's remaining muscle activity to direct the prosthesis. By decoding these signals, we can predict the intended hand and arm motions and translate them into real-time actions. Recent strides in machine learning have made EMG-based control more adaptable, offering users a more intuitive experience. Alongside this, researchers are exploring tactile sensors for enhanced feedback, materials resilient in harsh conditions, and mechanical designs that better replicate the intricacies of a biological limb. This review brings together these advancements, focusing on emerging trends and future directions in robotic upper-limb prosthesis development.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsElectromyographyMachine LearningRoboticsUpper ExtremityHumansProsthesis DesignTouchcontrolEMG signal processingmachine learningprosthetic materialsrobotic hand prosthesistactile sensing

Identifiers

PMID40648148
PMCPMC12251605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.