ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Onboard LiDAR-Camera Deployment Optimization for Pavement Marking Distress Fusion Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pavement markings, as a crucial component of traffic guidance and safety facilities, are subject to degradation and abrasion after a period of service. To ensure traffic safety, retroreflectivity and diffuse illumination should be above the minimum thresholds and required to undergo inspection periodically. Therefore, an onboard light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and camera deployment optimization method is proposed for pavement marking distress detection to adapt to complex traffic conditions, such as shadows and changing light. First, LiDAR and camera sensors' detection capability was assessed based on the sensors' built-in features. Then, the LiDAR-camera deployment problem was mathematically formulated for pavement marking distress fusion detection. Finally, an improved red fox optimization (RFO) algorithm was developed to solve the deployment optimization problem by incorporating a multi-dimensional trap mechanism and an improved prey position update strategy. The experimental results illustrate that the proposed method achieves 5217 LiDAR points, which fall on a 0.58 m pavement marking per data frame for distress fusion detection, with a relative error of less than 7% between the mathematical calculation and the field test measurements. This empirical accuracy underscores the proposed method's robustness in real-world scenarios, effectively mitigating the challenges posed by environmental interference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.