ReviewPolymers2025
Liquid Hot Water and Steam Explosion Pretreatment Methods for Cellulosic Raw Materials: A Review.
Review in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Synergistic pretreatment: hybrid strategies for maximum lignocellulose valorization.Biodegradation · 2026Review
- Low-Concentration Chemical Pretreatment of Lignocellulose Biomass Derived from Hemp Hurds, Agricultural Waste: Comparative Characterisation of Various Pretreatment Methods.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Role of nanomaterials for effective lignocellulosic biomass wastes conversion to hydrogen: a biorefinery perspective on commercialization and sustainability, challenges, and prospects.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Cellulosic raw materials are the most common source of carbon on Earth and are in great demand for the production of high-value-added products. Cellulosic feedstocks represent a strong matrix consisting of cellulose, lignin, and hemicelluloses. The efficient transformation of cellulosic raw materials into fermentable sugars requires the use of effective pretreatment strategies. The methods employed for pretreatment should be efficient, have low operating costs, and exhibit lower environmental impact. The present review describes pretreatment methods like liquid hot water (LHW) and steam explosion (SE) and highlights peculiar features, benefits and disadvantages of these processes. The effectiveness of these pretreatment methods and their effect on cellulosic raw materials strongly depends on the type of feedstock (component composition), pretreatment method, and pretreatment conditions (pressure, temperature, time, etc.). The LHW pretreatment requires neither addition of chemicals and catalysts nor grinding stage, but requires high energy inputs. The SE pretreatment is regarded as environmentally friendly and requires lower energy inputs, but contributes to the formation of toxic compounds. The life cycle assessment approach demonstrated that the SE pretreatment outperforms dilute acid pretreatment methods and allows the reduction of energy inputs, thereby improving the environmental performance of the process, while the LHW method improves long-term energy security and creates a greener future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.