ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Emerging Diagnostic Approaches for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Advances in Imaging, Biomarkers, and Clinical Assessment.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Traditional Risk Scores: Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Plaque Characterization and Personalized Atherosclerosis Management.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Clinical, Radiological, and Biochemical Evaluation in Orthopedics: Lessons from a Special Issue.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Explainable Two-Stage Xception-Swin Transformer Learning for Body-Part-Aware Fracture Detection in Musculoskeletal X-Rays.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Asymptomatic Shoulder Involvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Prospective Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Deduction of Back Pain Patients Using EMG Technology and Inertial Sensors During Functional Tests.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Orthopaedics: Clinical Performance, Limitations, and Translational Readiness-A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Prospect of Wearable Ultrasound.BME frontiers · 2026Article
- Calcineurin Inhibitors: Current Role, Toxicity Management, and Future Frontiers in Immunosuppression.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Current Mechanobiological Pathways and Therapies Driving Spinal Health.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders remain a major global cause of disability, with diagnostic complexity arising from their heterogeneous presentation and multifactorial pathophysiology. Recent advances across imaging modalities, molecular biomarkers, artificial intelligence applications, and point-of-care technologies are fundamentally reshaping musculoskeletal diagnostics. This review offers a novel synthesis by unifying recent innovations across multiple diagnostic imaging modalities, such as CT, MRI, and ultrasound, with emerging biochemical, genetic, and digital technologies. While existing reviews typically focus on advances within a single modality or for specific MSK conditions, this paper integrates a broad spectrum of developments to highlight how use of multimodal diagnostic strategies in combination can improve disease detection, stratification, and clinical decision-making in real-world settings. Technological developments in imaging, including photon-counting detector computed tomography, quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, and four-dimensional computed tomography, have enhanced the ability to visualize structural and dynamic musculoskeletal abnormalities with greater precision. Molecular imaging and biochemical markers such as CTX-II (C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type II collagen) and PINP (procollagen type I N-propeptide) provide early, objective indicators of tissue degeneration and bone turnover, while genetic and epigenetic profiling can elucidate individual patterns of susceptibility. Point-of-care ultrasound and portable diagnostic devices have expanded real-time imaging and functional assessment capabilities across diverse clinical settings. Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms now automate image interpretation, predict clinical outcomes, and enhance clinical decision support, complementing conventional clinical evaluations. Wearable sensors and mobile health technologies extend continuous monitoring beyond traditional healthcare environments, generating real-world data critical for dynamic disease management. However, standardization of diagnostic protocols, rigorous validation of novel methodologies, and thoughtful integration of multimodal data remain essential for translating technological advances into improved patient outcomes. Despite these advances, several key limitations constrain widespread clinical adoption. Imaging modalities lack standardized acquisition protocols and reference values, making cross-site comparison and clinical interpretation difficult. AI-driven diagnostic tools often suffer from limited external validation and transparency ("black-box" models), impacting clinicians' trust and hindering regulatory approval. Molecular markers like CTX-II and PINP, though promising, show variability due to diurnal fluctuations and comorbid conditions, complicating their use in routine monitoring. Integration of multimodal data, especially across imaging, omics, and wearable devices, remains technically and logistically complex, requiring robust data infrastructure and informatics expertise not yet widely available in MSK clinical practice. Furthermore, reimbursement models have not caught up with many of these innovations, limiting access in resource-constrained healthcare settings. As these fields converge, musculoskeletal diagnostics methods are poised to evolve into a more precise, personalized, and patient-centered discipline, driving meaningful improvements in musculoskeletal health worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.