Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40647646›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Emerging Diagnostic Approaches for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Advances in Imaging, Biomarkers, and Clinical Assessment.

Rahul Kumar, Kiran Marla, Kyle Sporn, Phani Paladugu, Akshay Khanna, Chirag Gowda, Alex Ngo, Ethan Waisberg, Ram Jagadeesan, Alireza Tavakkoli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rahul KumarDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8574-2895
Kiran MarlaCarver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9513-1422
Kyle SpornNorton College of Medicine, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-5707-9009
Phani PaladuguBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Akshay KhannaSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19144, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-4384-2693
Chirag GowdaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-8177-2784
Alex NgoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Ethan WaisbergDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK.
Ram JagadeesanWhiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Alireza TavakkoliDepartment of Computer Science, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-1269

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders remain a major global cause of disability, with diagnostic complexity arising from their heterogeneous presentation and multifactorial pathophysiology. Recent advances across imaging modalities, molecular biomarkers, artificial intelligence applications, and point-of-care technologies are fundamentally reshaping musculoskeletal diagnostics. This review offers a novel synthesis by unifying recent innovations across multiple diagnostic imaging modalities, such as CT, MRI, and ultrasound, with emerging biochemical, genetic, and digital technologies. While existing reviews typically focus on advances within a single modality or for specific MSK conditions, this paper integrates a broad spectrum of developments to highlight how use of multimodal diagnostic strategies in combination can improve disease detection, stratification, and clinical decision-making in real-world settings. Technological developments in imaging, including photon-counting detector computed tomography, quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, and four-dimensional computed tomography, have enhanced the ability to visualize structural and dynamic musculoskeletal abnormalities with greater precision. Molecular imaging and biochemical markers such as CTX-II (C-terminal cross-linked telopeptides of type II collagen) and PINP (procollagen type I N-propeptide) provide early, objective indicators of tissue degeneration and bone turnover, while genetic and epigenetic profiling can elucidate individual patterns of susceptibility. Point-of-care ultrasound and portable diagnostic devices have expanded real-time imaging and functional assessment capabilities across diverse clinical settings. Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms now automate image interpretation, predict clinical outcomes, and enhance clinical decision support, complementing conventional clinical evaluations. Wearable sensors and mobile health technologies extend continuous monitoring beyond traditional healthcare environments, generating real-world data critical for dynamic disease management. However, standardization of diagnostic protocols, rigorous validation of novel methodologies, and thoughtful integration of multimodal data remain essential for translating technological advances into improved patient outcomes. Despite these advances, several key limitations constrain widespread clinical adoption. Imaging modalities lack standardized acquisition protocols and reference values, making cross-site comparison and clinical interpretation difficult. AI-driven diagnostic tools often suffer from limited external validation and transparency ("black-box" models), impacting clinicians' trust and hindering regulatory approval. Molecular markers like CTX-II and PINP, though promising, show variability due to diurnal fluctuations and comorbid conditions, complicating their use in routine monitoring. Integration of multimodal data, especially across imaging, omics, and wearable devices, remains technically and logistically complex, requiring robust data infrastructure and informatics expertise not yet widely available in MSK clinical practice. Furthermore, reimbursement models have not caught up with many of these innovations, limiting access in resource-constrained healthcare settings. As these fields converge, musculoskeletal diagnostics methods are poised to evolve into a more precise, personalized, and patient-centered discipline, driving meaningful improvements in musculoskeletal health worldwide.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomarkersclinical assessmentmovement analysismusculoskeletal imagingpoint-of-care ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40647646
PMCPMC12248478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.