Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40647608›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Challenges in Diagnosing the Course of the Lingual Nerve for Clinical Practice and Research.

Wei Cheong Ngeow, Hui Wen Tay, Krishan Sarna, Chia Wei Cheah, Mary Raj, Surendra Kumar Acharya, Zhong Zheng Koo, Mang Chek Wey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wei Cheong NgeowFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-4354-3518
Hui Wen TayFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-8504-3955
Krishan SarnaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Oral Pathology and Oral Medicine, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi, Nairobi 10110, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-4369-093X
Chia Wei CheahFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-5795-4249
Mary RajOral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7305-358X
Surendra Kumar AcharyaFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3387-8920
Zhong Zheng KooPrivate Practice, Petaling Jaya 43300, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0000-4548-9733
Mang Chek WeyFaculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-0188-0727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate identification and protection of the lingual nerve during oral surgery are critical to avoid complications such as a loss of taste or sensation and chronic pain. While numerous studies have described the nerve's anatomy and injury outcomes, no consensus exists on the optimal method to trace its full course. This narrative review systematically examined the literature from 2010 to 2024, using databases like PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar. Keywords included "Lingual nerve," "Course," "Anatomy," and "Clinical implications," combined with Boolean operators. Studies were selected based on defined criteria, and findings were synthesized to highlight key challenges in diagnosing the nerve's path. This review identifies difficulties at multiple anatomical sites: the foramen ovale, infratemporal fossa, pterygomandibular space, third molar and retromolar regions, premolar/molar areas, floor of the mouth, and anterior gingiva and tongue. Lingual nerve injury, especially during lower third molar surgeries, remains a major concern, often exacerbated by factors like patient age, unerupted teeth, and lingual surgical approaches. Effective prevention hinges on precise anatomical knowledge and meticulous surgical technique. Microsurgical repair remains the primary treatment but often yields unpredictable outcomes. Emerging regenerative therapies show early promise but require further clinical validation. Imaging tools such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound may enhance diagnostic accuracy and surgical planning; however, each has limitations in everyday practice. Ultimately, early identification, careful surgical handling, and appropriate imaging support are vital for improving patient outcomes and minimizing the risks of lingual nerve injury.

Indexed as

anatomyclinical implicationcourselingual nerve

Identifiers

PMID40647608
PMCPMC12249358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.