ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Challenges in Diagnosing the Course of the Lingual Nerve for Clinical Practice and Research.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate identification and protection of the lingual nerve during oral surgery are critical to avoid complications such as a loss of taste or sensation and chronic pain. While numerous studies have described the nerve's anatomy and injury outcomes, no consensus exists on the optimal method to trace its full course. This narrative review systematically examined the literature from 2010 to 2024, using databases like PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar. Keywords included "Lingual nerve," "Course," "Anatomy," and "Clinical implications," combined with Boolean operators. Studies were selected based on defined criteria, and findings were synthesized to highlight key challenges in diagnosing the nerve's path. This review identifies difficulties at multiple anatomical sites: the foramen ovale, infratemporal fossa, pterygomandibular space, third molar and retromolar regions, premolar/molar areas, floor of the mouth, and anterior gingiva and tongue. Lingual nerve injury, especially during lower third molar surgeries, remains a major concern, often exacerbated by factors like patient age, unerupted teeth, and lingual surgical approaches. Effective prevention hinges on precise anatomical knowledge and meticulous surgical technique. Microsurgical repair remains the primary treatment but often yields unpredictable outcomes. Emerging regenerative therapies show early promise but require further clinical validation. Imaging tools such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound may enhance diagnostic accuracy and surgical planning; however, each has limitations in everyday practice. Ultimately, early identification, careful surgical handling, and appropriate imaging support are vital for improving patient outcomes and minimizing the risks of lingual nerve injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.