Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40647570›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Should We Fear Wipe-Out in Glaucoma Surgery?

Marco Zeppieri, Ludovica Cannizzaro, Giuseppe Gagliano, Francesco Cappellani, Lorenzo Rapisarda, Alfonso Spinello, Antonio Longo, Andrea Russo, Alessandro Avitabile

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marco ZeppieriDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0999-5545
Ludovica CannizzaroDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-7556-6952
Giuseppe GaglianoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-0059-5253
Francesco CappellaniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna "Kore", Piazza dell'Università, 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-6807-9455
Lorenzo RapisardaASP 8 Siracusa, PO Umberto I, 96100 Siracusa, Italy.
Alfonso SpinelloMediterranean Foundation "G.B. Morgagni", Via Sant'Euplio, 95100 Catania, Italy.
Antonio LongoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Andrea RussoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
Alessandro AvitabileDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0009-0003-1051-876X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wipe-out is defined as a sudden, unexplained, and irreversible loss of residual central vision following glaucoma surgery, typically in eyes with advanced visual field damage and severely compromised optic nerves. The purpose of this review is to critically assess the current incidence, risk factors, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinical relevance of "wipe-out", a rare but devastating complication of glaucoma surgery characterized by sudden, unexplained central vision loss postoperatively. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, analyzing key peer-reviewed studies from electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar) published up to 2025. The data from the literature published prior to the year 2000 suggest that wipe-out incidences range broadly from <1% to 13%. Contemporary prospective studies and large-scale reviews indicate a significantly lower current incidence, frequently below 1%. Identified risk factors include severe preoperative visual field loss (especially split fixation), older age, immediate postoperative hypotony, and compromised optic nerve head perfusion. The proposed mechanisms involve acute vascular insults, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and accelerated apoptosis of already vulnerable retinal ganglion cells. Modern MIGS and refined trabeculectomy techniques exhibit notably lower wipe-out risks compared to historical data. The literature emphasizes preventive management, including careful patient selection, incremental intraocular pressure reduction, and minimally invasive anesthetic approaches. Although wipe-out syndrome represents a serious complication, its incidence in modern glaucoma surgery is minimal. The considerable benefits of contemporary surgical approaches-particularly MIGS-in preserving vision clearly outweigh this very low risk. Ophthalmologists should remain vigilant but confident in the safety and efficacy of modern glaucoma surgical techniques, emphasizing proactive intervention to prevent blindness rather than avoiding necessary surgery in consideration of the minimal risk of wipe-out.

Indexed as

glaucomaMIGSvision losswipe-out

Identifiers

PMID40647570
PMCPMC12248684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.