ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Should We Fear Wipe-Out in Glaucoma Surgery?
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Using selective laser trabeculoplasty to manage glaucoma in a child with phakomatosis pigmentovascularis.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wipe-out is defined as a sudden, unexplained, and irreversible loss of residual central vision following glaucoma surgery, typically in eyes with advanced visual field damage and severely compromised optic nerves. The purpose of this review is to critically assess the current incidence, risk factors, pathophysiological mechanisms, and clinical relevance of "wipe-out", a rare but devastating complication of glaucoma surgery characterized by sudden, unexplained central vision loss postoperatively. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, analyzing key peer-reviewed studies from electronic databases (PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar) published up to 2025. The data from the literature published prior to the year 2000 suggest that wipe-out incidences range broadly from <1% to 13%. Contemporary prospective studies and large-scale reviews indicate a significantly lower current incidence, frequently below 1%. Identified risk factors include severe preoperative visual field loss (especially split fixation), older age, immediate postoperative hypotony, and compromised optic nerve head perfusion. The proposed mechanisms involve acute vascular insults, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and accelerated apoptosis of already vulnerable retinal ganglion cells. Modern MIGS and refined trabeculectomy techniques exhibit notably lower wipe-out risks compared to historical data. The literature emphasizes preventive management, including careful patient selection, incremental intraocular pressure reduction, and minimally invasive anesthetic approaches. Although wipe-out syndrome represents a serious complication, its incidence in modern glaucoma surgery is minimal. The considerable benefits of contemporary surgical approaches-particularly MIGS-in preserving vision clearly outweigh this very low risk. Ophthalmologists should remain vigilant but confident in the safety and efficacy of modern glaucoma surgical techniques, emphasizing proactive intervention to prevent blindness rather than avoiding necessary surgery in consideration of the minimal risk of wipe-out.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.