ReviewCancers2025
Treatment Intensification Prior to Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recovery of urinary continence after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy plus radical prostatectomy: A multicenter retro-prospective cohort study with propensity score matching.Asian journal of urology · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy reduces biochemical recurrence risk and improves urinary continence recovery compared with laparoscopic approach in high-risk localized prostate cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a real-world propensity score-matched analysis.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus androgen deprivation therapy before radical prostatectomy in high-risk localized prostate cancer.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Association between duration of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and prostate-specific antigen response and pathological outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for unfavorable intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer. There has been emerging interest in the potential benefits of neoadjuvant ADT prior to RP for this population. Past trials indicate neoadjuvant ADT may be associated with reduced surgical complexity, pathologic downstaging, decreased positive margins, and decreased rates of nodal positivity, although they have not shown benefits for cancer progression and survival. Accordingly, neoadjuvant ADT is currently not recommended for surgical patients. Conversely, ADT is a mainstay of treatment in metastatic disease, and interest remains in expanding its use towards patients with clinically localized disease. There are several ongoing trials of second-generation androgen blockers such as enzalutamide, darolutamide, radiopharmaceuticals, and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors to explore long-term cancer-specific survival benefits with neoadjuvant use. In this narrative review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the recent literature and ongoing efforts to incorporate neoadjuvant therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer patients who are at high-risk of recurrence after prostatectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.