ReviewCancers2025
Regenerative Immunotherapy for Cancer: Transcription Factor Reprogramming of Tumor-Specific T Cells.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-based immunotherapy is a promising treatment strategy for cancer. Particularly in the case of solid tumors, however, this strategy only benefits a minority of patients. A critical limitation to immunotherapy is T cell exhaustion, a terminal differentiation state characterized by loss of self-renewal and cytotoxic capacity. For over a decade, regenerative immunology approaches to overcome exhaustion and restore stem-like features of T cells have been pursued. The reprogramming of tumor-specific T cells back to a less-differentiated, stem-like state using induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology has been viewed as a powerful and highly appealing strategy to overcome the limitations imposed by exhaustion. However, clinical translation of these approaches has been stymied by the requirement for subsequent iPSC-to-T cell re-maturation strategies, vanishingly low efficiencies, and resource-intensive cell culture protocols. In this review, we discuss the emergence of transcription factor reprogramming to iPSCs, contemporary techniques for T cell reprogramming, as well as techniques for re-differentiation into mature T cells. We discuss the potential clinical utility of T cell reprogramming and re-maturation strategies alongside progress and major roadblocks toward clinical translation. If these challenges can be addressed, transcription factor reprogramming of T cells into iPSCs and subsequent re-maturation into tumor-specific stem-like T cells may represent an incredibly efficacious approach to cancer immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.