ArticleCancers2025
Exploring the Potential of a Deep Learning Model for Early CT Detection of High-Grade Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression and Its Impact on Treatment Delays.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic errors in spinal metastases: a systematic review of contributing clinical and systemic factors.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDelay in diagnosing metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) adversely impacts clinical outcomes. High-grade MESCC is frequently overlooked on routine staging CT scans. We aim to assess the potential of our deep learning model (DLM) in detecting high-grade MESCC and reducing diagnostic delays.
methodsThis retrospective review analyzed 140 patients with surgically treated MESCC between C7 and L2 during 2015-2022. An experienced radiologist (serving as the reference standard), a consultant spine surgeon, and the DLM independently classified staging CT scans into high-grade MESCC or not. The findings were compared to original radiologist (OR) reports; inter-rater agreement was assessed. Diagnostic delay referred to the number of days elapsed from CT to diagnostic MRI scan.
resultsOverall, 95/140 (67.8%) patients had preoperative CT scans. High-grade MESCC was identified in 84/95 (88.4%) of the scans by the radiologist (reference standard), but in only 32/95 (33.7%) of the preoperative scans reported by the OR. There was almost perfect agreement between the radiologist and the surgeon (kappa = 0.947, 95% CI = 0.893-1.000) (
conclusionsThe original radiologist reports frequently missed high-grade MESCC in staging CT. Our DLM for CT diagnosis of high-grade MESCC showed almost perfect inter-rater agreement with two experienced reviewers. This study is the first to demonstrate that the DLM could help reduce diagnostic delays. Further prospective research is required to understand its precise role in improving the early diagnosis/treatment of MESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.