Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40647476›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

SPP-SegNet and SE-DenseNet201: A Dual-Model Approach for Cervical Cell Segmentation and Classification.

Betelhem Zewdu Wubineh, Andrzej Rusiecki, Krzysztof Halawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Betelhem Zewdu WubinehFaculty of Information and Communication Technology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4790-7449
Andrzej RusieckiFaculty of Information and Communication Technology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2239-1076
Krzysztof HalawaFaculty of Information and Communication Technology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6508-0468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesCervical cancer, the fourth most common malignancy in women worldwide, continues to pose a significant threat to global health. Manual examination of the Pap smear image is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and prone to human error due to the large number of slides and subjective judgment. This study proposes a novel SegNet-based spatial pyramid pooling (SPP-SegNet) deep learning model for segmentation and a Squeeze-and-Excitation-based (SE-DenseNet201) model for classification, aimed at improving the accuracy of cervical cancer detection.

methodsThe model incorporates the SPP bottleneck and atrous convolution in the SegNet framework, allowing for the extraction of multiscale spatial features and improving segmentation performance. The segmentation output is used as input for the classification task. The proposed method is evaluated on the Pomeranian and SIPaKMeD datasets.

resultsSegmentation results show that SPP-SegNet achieves 98.53% accuracy on the Pomeranian data set, exceeding standard SegNet, 97.86%. It also achieves 94.15% accuracy on the SIPaKMeD dataset, outperforming the standard SegNet, which is 90.95%. For classification, SE-DenseNet201 achieves 93% and 99% accuracy for the Pomeranian and SIPaKMeD binary classification, respectively, using the bounding box input.

conclusionsThese results show that SPP-SegNet and SE-DenseNet201 can potentially automate cervical cell segmentation and classification, facilitating the early detection and diagnosis of cervical cancer.

Indexed as

cervical cancerclassificationimage segmentationSE-DenseNet201SegNet

Identifiers

PMID40647476
PMCPMC12249163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.