ArticleCancers2025
Performance and Prognostic Relevance of Lymph Node Assessment by One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification Assay in Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesLymph node metastases (LNM) undetected by standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) have been associated with unfavorable prognosis in colorectal cancer. The One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification (OSNA) assay has demonstrated superior sensitivity in detecting LNM compared to H&E. We aimed to assess the performance of OSNA in detecting LNM, as well as its prognostic value in rectal cancer (RC) patients.
methodsLymph nodes (LNs) of patients from 15 centers were analyzed by both H&E and OSNA. The total tumor load (TTL) was defined as the sum of cytokeratin 19 mRNA copies/µL in all LNs from a surgical specimen, using a threshold of 250 copies/μL for OSNA positivity. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess the effect of TTL ≥ 250 or 6000 copies/μL on cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), with Firth's method applied to account for low event rate.
resultsA total of 97 RC patients were included. Of these, 84 patients were eligible for survival analysis. The sensitivity and specificity of OSNA, compared to H&E, were 91.7% and 84.7%, respectively. TTL ≥ 6000 versus <6000 copies/μL was related to worse CSS and RFS. When dividing TTL into three groups: ≤250, 250-6000, and >6000 copies/μL, only TTL ≥ 6000 copies/μL was significantly associated with worse CSS and RFS.
conclusionsThe OSNA assay is highly sensitive for detecting LNM in RC patients. A TTL of ≥6000 copies/μL could identify a subset of RC patients with worse CSS and RFS who might benefit from adjuvant treatment or intensive surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.