ReviewCancers2025
Overcoming Barriers in Cancer Biology Research: Current Limitations and Solutions.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammation and carcinogenesis: molecular targets and small-molecule intervention strategies.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Evaluation of CNS xenograft brain tumour response to MRI-guided focused ultrasound in combination with radiation therapy.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Advanced gene editing technologies for oncology mechanisms, applications, and clinical implementation.Cancer gene therapy · 2026Review
- Novel C3/C28-bis-1,2,4-Triazolyl-sulfanylacetate-betulin Derivatives: Synthesis and Evaluation of Anticancer Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- From Therapeutic Drug to Xenobiotic in Cancer Repurposing: Clozapine Mechanisms, Metabolic Liabilities, and Human-Relevant Translational Approaches.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Review
- Gastric Cancer Organoids: Mechanistic Insights, Drug Discovery, and Translational Advances in Precision Medicine.Journal of gastric cancer · 2026Review
- Nanotherapeutics to Overcome Chemotherapy Resistance in Ovarian Cancer.Pharmaceutical research · 2026Review
- Harnessing archaeogenetic for cancer therapy: bridging ancient DNA insights with modern therapeutic innovations.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Review
- Therapeutic horizons of cuproptosis: bibliometric mapping of copper-dependent cell death research and its pharmacological implications.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Optimization of RNP-CRISPR for high-efficiency gene editing in mouse intestinal organoids.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2026Article
- Understanding Cancer Health Disparities.Cancers · 2026Review
- Tumor microenvironment conversion through intelligent nanomedicine: a paradigm shift in overcoming chemoresistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Targeting cancer stem cell plasticity and tumor microenvironment crosstalk: a comprehensive review.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Exploring the therapeutic potential of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells derived extracellular vesicles in cancer immunotherapy.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Genome doubling as a dynamic driver of ovarian cancer evolution: insights from single-cell sequencing.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
- Single-cell transcriptomics in metastatic breast cancer: mapping tumor evolution and therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Strategies for the drug development of cancer therapeutics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer research faces significant biological, technological, and systemic limitations that hinder the development of effective therapies and improved patient outcomes. Traditional preclinical models, such as 2D and 3D cell cultures, murine xenografts, and organoids, often fail to reflect the complexity of human tumor architecture, microenvironment, and immune interactions. This discrepancy results in promising laboratory findings not always translating effectively into clinical success. A core obstacle is tumor heterogeneity, characterized by diverse genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic variations within tumors, which complicates treatment strategies and contributes to drug resistance. Hereditary malignancies and cancer stem cells contribute strongly to generating this complex panorama. Current early detection technologies lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity, impeding timely diagnosis. The tumor microenvironment, with its intricate interactions and resistance-promoting factors, further promotes treatment failure. Additionally, we only partially understand the biological processes driving metastasis, limiting therapeutic advances. Overcoming these barriers involves not only the use of new methodological approaches and advanced technologies, but also requires a cultural effort by researchers. Many cancer studies are still essentially observational. While acknowledging their significance, it is crucial to recognize the shift from deterministic to indeterministic paradigms in biomedicine over the past two to three decades, a transition facilitated by systems biology. It has opened the doors of deep metabolism where the functional processes that control and regulate cancer progression operate. Beyond biological barriers, systemic challenges include limited funding, regulatory complexities, and disparities in cancer care access across different populations. These socio-economic factors exacerbate research stagnation and hinder the translation of scientific innovations into clinical practice. Overcoming these obstacles requires multidisciplinary collaborations, advanced modeling techniques that better emulate human cancer, and innovative technologies for early detection and targeted therapy. Strategic policy initiatives must address systemic barriers, promoting health equity and sustainable research funding. While the complexity of cancer biology and systemic challenges are formidable, ongoing scientific progress and collaborative efforts inspire hope for breakthroughs that can transform cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival outcomes worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.