Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40647400›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Overcoming Barriers in Cancer Biology Research: Current Limitations and Solutions.

Giovanni Colonna

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Giovanni ColonnaMedical Informatics Unit-AOU L. Vanvitelli, Università della Campania, 80138 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer research faces significant biological, technological, and systemic limitations that hinder the development of effective therapies and improved patient outcomes. Traditional preclinical models, such as 2D and 3D cell cultures, murine xenografts, and organoids, often fail to reflect the complexity of human tumor architecture, microenvironment, and immune interactions. This discrepancy results in promising laboratory findings not always translating effectively into clinical success. A core obstacle is tumor heterogeneity, characterized by diverse genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic variations within tumors, which complicates treatment strategies and contributes to drug resistance. Hereditary malignancies and cancer stem cells contribute strongly to generating this complex panorama. Current early detection technologies lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity, impeding timely diagnosis. The tumor microenvironment, with its intricate interactions and resistance-promoting factors, further promotes treatment failure. Additionally, we only partially understand the biological processes driving metastasis, limiting therapeutic advances. Overcoming these barriers involves not only the use of new methodological approaches and advanced technologies, but also requires a cultural effort by researchers. Many cancer studies are still essentially observational. While acknowledging their significance, it is crucial to recognize the shift from deterministic to indeterministic paradigms in biomedicine over the past two to three decades, a transition facilitated by systems biology. It has opened the doors of deep metabolism where the functional processes that control and regulate cancer progression operate. Beyond biological barriers, systemic challenges include limited funding, regulatory complexities, and disparities in cancer care access across different populations. These socio-economic factors exacerbate research stagnation and hinder the translation of scientific innovations into clinical practice. Overcoming these obstacles requires multidisciplinary collaborations, advanced modeling techniques that better emulate human cancer, and innovative technologies for early detection and targeted therapy. Strategic policy initiatives must address systemic barriers, promoting health equity and sustainable research funding. While the complexity of cancer biology and systemic challenges are formidable, ongoing scientific progress and collaborative efforts inspire hope for breakthroughs that can transform cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival outcomes worldwide.

Indexed as

advanced approaches for cancer progressioncancercancer stem cellsdeep molecular mechanisms in cancerdeterminism and indeterminism in cancerdrug resistanceepigenetic heterogeneityhereditary malignanciesnovel approaches in studying cancertumor heterogeneitytumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID40647400
PMCPMC12248693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.