Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40647367›Full record

ReviewCancers2025

Ultraprocessed Food and Risk of Cancer: Mechanistic Pathways and Public Health Implications.

Bruna Menegassi, Manlio Vinciguerra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Toward AI-Assisted Methodological Evaluations of Health Risk Analyses Using Diverse Types of Evidence.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Ultra-processed Foods and Gastrointestinal Cancer: Epidemiologic Evidence, Mechanistic Pathways, and Clinical Implications.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Modulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bruna MenegassiSociology and Communication Department, Social Sciences Faculty, Salamanca University, 37008 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2942-6932
Manlio VinciguerraDepartment of Translational Stem Cell Biology, Research Institute, Medical University of Varna, 9002 Varna, Bulgaria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultraprocessed foods (UPFs), now dominant in global diets, pose health risks that go beyond poor nutrition due to the synergistic effects of compounds in their ultracomplex industrial formulations. This narrative review aims to provide researchers and health professionals in the field of cancer with updated and critical information, as they are often unaware of the complex and evolving evidence linking UPFs to carcinogenesis. The review discusses potential mechanisms through which UPFs may contribute to cancer development, including harmful additives, neo-formed contaminants, and packaging-derived substances, as well as the displacement of protective nutrients found in whole foods. Despite limitations in establishing direct causality, epidemiological studies consistently associate high UPF intake with increased incidence of various cancers, notably colorectal, breast, and pancreatic cancers. These findings reflect a broader paradigm shift in nutritional epidemiology, recognizing that food processing is an essential dimension of diet-related health risks. To mitigate the impact of UPFs, the review emphasizes the need for preventive strategies that integrate clear dietary guidelines, regulatory measures on food labeling and additives, and public education campaigns. Successful international experiences in regulating marketing and improving transparency serve as important references. Moreover, eliminating corporate influence and conflicts of interest is crucial to ensure that public health, rather than industry agendas, guides nutrition policy. As scientific research advances to clarify the mechanisms of action and synergistic effects of harmful compounds in UPFs, coordinated efforts are needed to reduce their consumption and ultimately alleviate the global cancer burden.

Indexed as

cancer riskfood additivesnutritional epidemiologypublic healthultraprocessed foods

Identifiers

PMID40647367
PMCPMC12249103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.