ArticleNutrients2025
Dietary Carnosine Supplementation in Healthy Human Volunteers: A Safety, Tolerability, Plasma and Brain Concentration Study.
Article in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a single dose of L-histidine on mental fatigue and vigor in participants with high fatigue levels: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Considerations for Carnosine Actions in Biology.Neurochemical research · 2026Review
- Nutraceuticals for Preventing and Managing Cancer Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity: An Updated Comprehensive Review.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Preclinical evidence and therapeutic perspectives on carnosine for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders.AIMS neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCarnosine is a multimodal pleotropic endogenous molecule that exhibits properties that make it a compelling therapeutic agent for further evaluation in a number of diseases. However, little data currently exists on its pharmacokinetic profile, maximum tolerated doses, side effects and whether oral administration can lead to elevated brain concentrations.
methodTo investigate this, sixteen healthy volunteers underwent a single dose-escalation study of oral carnosine to establish safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. A subset (
resultsOral carnosine was safe and well tolerated up to a dose of 10 g. At doses of 15 g, the frequency of adverse events became unacceptably high, with 77% of participants experiencing side effects, most commonly headache (43.5%), nausea (21.7%) and paraesthesia (21.7%). While pharmacokinetic profiles varied between individuals, peak plasma concentrations occurred within the first hour of dosing. Little circulating carnosine was detectable beyond 4 h. Brain carnosine concentration increased at 1 h post-dose but reverted to baseline values by 5 h. Long-term dosing at 5 g twice daily did not result in any adverse events.
conclusionsOur data will inform dosing interventions in future clinical trials of this exciting agent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.