SynthesisNutrients2025
The Safety and Efficacy of Glucosamine and/or Chondroitin in Humans: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Cartilage-adhesive/penetrating pH-responsive polyphenol-glucosamine nanoparticles alleviate osteoarthritis by matrix remodeling and immune regulation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Bifidobacterium longum CBi0703 lysate modulates oxidative stress induced apoptosis and cartilage related gene expression in SW1353 chondrocytes: in vitro insights into the gut joint axis in Osteoarthritis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Real world evidence for glucosamine-chondroitin-calcium supplementation on joint pain.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesGlucosamine and chondroitin are natural substances often used alone or in combination for conditions affecting the joints. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucosamine and/or chondroitin supplementation in humans as well as to determine the common dosages used.
methodsA systematic review was conducted using PRISMA methodology. Searches were performed in PubMed and Web of Science and uploaded into Covidence where two independent researchers reviewed articles according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality assessment was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).
resultsOf the 2013 articles screened, 146 studies were included in our review, with nearly 60% being randomized controlled trials and most conducted in Europe, Asia, or the U.S. Most studies focused on osteoarthritis and joint pain, with over 90% of efficacy studies reporting positive outcomes and most safety studies indicating minimal or no adverse effects. Glucosamine and chondroitin were most commonly administered together at daily doses of 1500 mg and 1200 mg, respectively, and often compared to a placebo or celecoxib.
conclusionsOverall, the evidence suggests that glucosamine and chondroitin are generally effective and well-tolerated, particularly for managing osteoarthritis and joint pain. Consistent dosing strategies and favorable safety profiles across a diverse range of studies support their continued use in clinical practice, but further research is needed related to other disease states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.