Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40647098›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Nondestructive Detection and Quality Grading System of Walnut Using X-Ray Imaging and Lightweight WKNet.

Xiangpeng Fan, Jianping Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xiangpeng FanAgricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8181-7554
Jianping ZhouCollege of Mechanical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830017, China.

Funding

the Postdoctoral Science Foundation Project of China 2023M733814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The internal quality detection is extremely important. To solve the challenges of walnut quality detection, we presented the first comprehensive investigation of walnut quality detection method using X-ray imaging and deep learning model. An X-ray machine vision system was designed, and a walnut kernel detection (called WKD) dataset was constructed. Then, an effective walnut kernel detection network (called WKNet) was developed by employing Transformer, GhostNet, and criss-cross attention (called CCA) module to the YOLO v5s model, aiming to solve the time consuming and parameter redundancy issues. The WKNet achieved an mAP_0.5 of 0.9869, precision of 0.9779, and recall of 0.9875 for walnut kernel detection. The inference time per image is only 11.9 ms. Extensive comparison experiments with the state-of-the-art (SOTA) deep learning models demonstrated the advanced nature of WKNet. The online test of walnut internal quality detection also shows satisfactory performance. The innovative combination of X-ray imaging and WKNet provide significant implications for walnut quality control.

Indexed as

lightweight modelnondestructive detectionwalnut internal qualityX-ray imagingYOLO v5s

Identifiers

PMID40647098
PMCPMC12249351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.