ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (H5N1) Clade 2.3.4.4b in Cattle: A Rising One Health Concern.
Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting Animal Reservoirs of Hantavirus and Other Zoonotic Viruses Associated with Cruise Travel: Impact and Prevention.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- From fragmentation to coordination: strengthening One Health research to support H5N1 preparedness in Cambodia.IJID regions · 2026Review
- Evaluation of IndiMix JOE with Intype IC-RNA as an Alternative to AgPath-ID for Influenza A Virus Detection in Avian and Bovine Samples.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Electroporation and LNP-mediated delivery of plasmid DNA-encoded H5N1 influenza virus hemagglutinin support protection against highly pathogenic avian influenza.NPJ vaccines · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1, particularly clade 2.3.4.4b, has demonstrated an unprecedented capacity for cross-species transmission, with recent reports confirming its presence in dairy cattle in the United States of America (USA) in 2024. This unexpected spillover challenges traditional understanding of the virus's host range and raises serious public health and veterinary concerns. Infected cattle presented with clinical signs such as decreased milk production, thickened or discolored milk, respiratory issues, and lethargy. Pathological findings revealed inflammation of the mammary glands and the detection of a virus in nasal secretions and raw milk, suggesting a potential for both intra- and interspecies transmission. While the current risk of human-to-human transmission remains low, the detection of H5N1 in a human exposed to infected cattle highlights the need for heightened surveillance and protective measures. Moreover, the presence of infectious viruses in the food chain, particularly in unpasteurized milk, introduces a new dimension of zoonotic risk. This review synthesizes emerging evidence on the epidemiology, pathology, diagnostic findings, and zoonotic implications of HPAI H5N1 infection in cattle. It also highlights the importance of genomic surveillance, intersectoral collaboration, and One Health approaches in managing this evolving threat. As the virus continues to circulate and adapt across diverse hosts, including wild birds, domestic poultry, and now mammals, the potential for reassortment and emergence of novel strains remains a significant concern. Immediate actions to strengthen biosecurity, monitor viral evolution, and protect both animal and human populations are critical to mitigate the global risk posed by this expanding panzootic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.