Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646858›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

The Boss Is Back in Town: Insights into the Wolf Recolonization of a Highly Anthropized and Low-Ungulate-Density Environment.

Lorenzo Frangini, Giacomo Marzano, Alice Comuzzi, Andrea De Giovanni, Andrea Gallizia, Marcello Franchini, Michela Rugge, Marco De Luca, Giuseppe De Matteis, Stefano Filacorda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lorenzo FranginiDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Via Sondrio 2/A, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1281-0188
Giacomo MarzanoManagement Consortium of the Torre Guaceto Marine Protected Area and State Natural Reserve, Via Sant'Anna 6, Carovigno, 72012 Brindisi, Italy.
Alice ComuzziDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Via Sondrio 2/A, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-9808-0420
Andrea De GiovanniIndependent Researcher, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7286-5105
Andrea GalliziaBiodiversity and Ecology Appennine Research Center, Contrada Palombarette 34, Pollenza, 62010 Macerata, Italy.
Marcello FranchiniDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Via Sondrio 2/A, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3050-3859
Michela RuggeDepartment of Cultural Heritage, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Marco De LucaIndependent Researcher, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Giuseppe De MatteisWWF Italia, Le Cesine State Natural Reserve, Masseria Cesine, Vernole, 73029 Lecce, Italy.
Stefano FilacordaDepartment of Agricultural, Food, Environmental and Animal Sciences, University of Udine, Via Sondrio 2/A, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0984-2373

Funding

Lecce Administration Province under the project "Wolf (Canis lupus) monitoring programme"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study documents the recolonization of the wolf using opportunistic and systematic data, including camera trapping and scat surveys in south-eastern Italy. Wolf distribution was mapped using a 10 × 10 km grid, and Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) were applied to identify environmental and anthropogenic drivers of stable presence. Camera trapping and scat analyses were used to provide the first insights into the activity patterns and feeding habits of the species. The results showed a significant expansion in wolf range, with occurrence increasing by 120%, especially in areas with high forest cover. During 1402 camera-trap nights, wolves and wild prey species displayed primarily nocturnal activity, reducing overlap with human presence, though prey activity peaks were offset from those of wolves. Diet analysis of 75 scats revealed a high occurrence of livestock and pets, along with all wild species living in the area (i.e., ungulates, medium-sized and micromammals). These findings underscore the wolf's ecological adaptability and ability to thrive in heavily altered landscapes. Indeed, this study shows how wolves were able to occupy even suboptimal areas, taking advantage of both anthropogenic and wild trophic resources, still displaying nocturnal activity to lower the probability of encounters with humans.

Indexed as

activity patternCanis lupusdiethuman-dominated landscapelivestock predationpet predation

Identifiers

PMID40646858
PMCPMC12249287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.