ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025
The Impact of Psychosocial Factors on the Human-Pet Bond: Insights from Cat and Dog Owners.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How University Students Evaluate the Use of Laboratory Animals: The Role of Species and Individual Differences.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Knowledge, Perceptions, Attitudes, and Practices of Dog and Cat Owners Regarding Skin Tumors: A Cross-Sectional Study.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study underscores how perceived social support, loneliness, and mental well-being shape the emotional bonds that Spanish cat and dog owners form with their pets. A total of 298 participants completed an online survey, including 109 cat owners (36.5%) and 189 dog owners (63.4%). Standardized and validated instruments were used: the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS), the UCLA Loneliness Scale, the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS), and the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS). The results confirmed that the attachment to dogs tends to be stronger than to cats, with demographic factors such as gender and age also playing a significant role in the attachment levels. While psychosocial variables did not directly predict the overall attachment scores, lower perceived social support was significantly associated with higher scores on the person substitution subscale among dog owners, indicating that dogs may serve as emotional substitutes for human companionship in socially vulnerable individuals. No comparable association was found among cat owners. These findings highlight species-specific differences in the human-pet bond and emphasize the multifaceted nature of attachment. This study underscores the importance of considering both demographic and psychosocial factors to better understand how pets contribute to human emotional well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.