Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646794›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

The Impact of Psychosocial Factors on the Human-Pet Bond: Insights from Cat and Dog Owners.

Garikoitz Azkona

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Garikoitz AzkonaDepartment of Basic Psychological Processes and Their Development, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (UPV/EHU), Tolosa Hiribidea 70, 20018 Donostia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5312-1207

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study underscores how perceived social support, loneliness, and mental well-being shape the emotional bonds that Spanish cat and dog owners form with their pets. A total of 298 participants completed an online survey, including 109 cat owners (36.5%) and 189 dog owners (63.4%). Standardized and validated instruments were used: the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS), the UCLA Loneliness Scale, the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS), and the Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale (LAPS). The results confirmed that the attachment to dogs tends to be stronger than to cats, with demographic factors such as gender and age also playing a significant role in the attachment levels. While psychosocial variables did not directly predict the overall attachment scores, lower perceived social support was significantly associated with higher scores on the person substitution subscale among dog owners, indicating that dogs may serve as emotional substitutes for human companionship in socially vulnerable individuals. No comparable association was found among cat owners. These findings highlight species-specific differences in the human-pet bond and emphasize the multifaceted nature of attachment. This study underscores the importance of considering both demographic and psychosocial factors to better understand how pets contribute to human emotional well-being.

Indexed as

attachmentcatdoglonelinessmental well-beingperson substitutionpet ownersocial support

Identifiers

PMID40646794
PMCPMC12248966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.