ReviewBioelectronic medicine2025
Reliability and stability of Bioelectronic Medicine: a critical and pedagogical perspective.
Review in Bioelectronic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organic semiconductor materials for neuromorphic and bioelectronic systems design rules and applications.iScience · 2026Review
- Research on Multi-Dimensional Bionic Design of Flexible ECG Electrodes for Wearable Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Tissue-bioelectronics interfaces.Chemical Society reviews · 2026Review
- Crosslinked hyaluronic acid-doped polypyrrole: Stable, nonbiofouling implantable bioelectrodes for in vivo signal recording.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Smart nanomaterials enabling drug delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes management.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Transforming healthcare through in-body bioelectronic systems.Nature communications · 2026Review
- Organic Transistor-Based Neuromorphic Electronics and Their Recent Applications.Small methods · 2026Review
- Emerging Implantable Sensor Technologies at the Intersection of Engineering and Brain Science.Biosensors · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioelectronic Medicine relies on wearable or implantable electronic devices interfacing with the nervous system and other active tissues, offering innovative therapeutic solutions. However, the long-term reliability and stability of these devices remain critical challenges that must be addressed for widespread clinical adoption. Advances in materials science, device engineering, power management, and biocompatibility are essential to ensure sustained functionality in dynamic biological environments. This perspective highlights key factors affecting the durability, reliability and stability of Bioelectronic Medicine technologies, explores current solutions and emerging approaches, and outlines the necessary steps to achieve robust, long-lasting bioelectronic therapeutics. The personal view expressed in this article is aimed to provide structured, accessible insights that support teaching and learning, and is envisioned to help motivate other investigators to develop further strategies for achieving clinically-relevant ultra-stable bioelectronics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.