Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646646›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025

The importance of redistribution process of ill-defined deaths in national mortality database.

Aline Scohy, Tina Lesnik, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Romana Haneef

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aline ScohyDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Tina LesnikNational Institute of Public Health, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Brecht DevleesschauwerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Romana HaneefCERPOP, UMR1295, unite mixte INSERM - University of Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. romana.haneef@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Causes of death (CoDs) statistics are an important source of information for epidemiological research. Some causes of death (CoDs) are not regarded as sufficiently specific causes of death for public health purposes, they are named "ill-defined deaths" (IDDs) or "garbage codes". Redistribution is the process of reallocating IDDs to plausible underlying causes (i.e., target cause) as defined in the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study. The main objectives of this commentary were to describe the various steps taken for the redistribution of IDDs by applying the Belgium redistribution approach to national mortality data sets and to underline key challenges with potential solutions.A four-step probabilistic redistribution method was developed in the context of the Belgian national Burden of Disease (BeBOD) study including followings: (1) predefined ICD codes, (2) package redistribution using multiple causes of death data (MCOD), (3) internal redistribution, and (4) redistribution to all causes. The Belgian, French and Slovenian mortality databases included a share of 34%, 36% and 20% of IDDs in 2017, respectively. The majority of the IDDs were redistributed using predefined ICD-10 codes (14%), followed by package redistribution using MCOD data (11%) in Belgium and French database, whereas this redistribution was 7% and 10% for Slovenia database, respectively. The main challenges encountered were lack of computational capacity to run 100 simulations and lack of MCOD.This commentary highlighted the importance of the harmonized approach of redistribution that allowed us to get an in-depth knowledge of various steps applied for the redistribution process transparently and allowed comparing these results with other European countries. Further research is recommended considering creating a common/standardized consensus list of IDDs based on a comprehensive definition and aligned with the context of national mortality databases in European countries.

Indexed as

Causes of deathGarbage codesGBDIDDsIll-defined deathsMortalityRedistribution

Identifiers

PMID40646646
PMCPMC12247471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.