ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
The importance of redistribution process of ill-defined deaths in national mortality database.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global, regional, and national burden and changing trends of hepatoblastoma and retinoblastoma from 1990 to 2021, and projections until 2050: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Social inequalities in cause-specific premature mortality in rural and urban France: a pre-pandemic population attributable fraction analysis.Population health metrics · 2026Article
- Enhancing identification of suspected unregulated drug toxicity deaths in administrative health records: a case study among people with HIV in British Columbia, Canada.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Regional disparities in breast cancer mortality in Brazil: a spatial analysis using uncorrected and adjusted data, 2000-2023.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Causes of death (CoDs) statistics are an important source of information for epidemiological research. Some causes of death (CoDs) are not regarded as sufficiently specific causes of death for public health purposes, they are named "ill-defined deaths" (IDDs) or "garbage codes". Redistribution is the process of reallocating IDDs to plausible underlying causes (i.e., target cause) as defined in the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study. The main objectives of this commentary were to describe the various steps taken for the redistribution of IDDs by applying the Belgium redistribution approach to national mortality data sets and to underline key challenges with potential solutions.A four-step probabilistic redistribution method was developed in the context of the Belgian national Burden of Disease (BeBOD) study including followings: (1) predefined ICD codes, (2) package redistribution using multiple causes of death data (MCOD), (3) internal redistribution, and (4) redistribution to all causes. The Belgian, French and Slovenian mortality databases included a share of 34%, 36% and 20% of IDDs in 2017, respectively. The majority of the IDDs were redistributed using predefined ICD-10 codes (14%), followed by package redistribution using MCOD data (11%) in Belgium and French database, whereas this redistribution was 7% and 10% for Slovenia database, respectively. The main challenges encountered were lack of computational capacity to run 100 simulations and lack of MCOD.This commentary highlighted the importance of the harmonized approach of redistribution that allowed us to get an in-depth knowledge of various steps applied for the redistribution process transparently and allowed comparing these results with other European countries. Further research is recommended considering creating a common/standardized consensus list of IDDs based on a comprehensive definition and aligned with the context of national mortality databases in European countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.