ArticleClinical epigenetics2025
Multiple highly methylated CpG sites as potential epigenetic markers for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in men. The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test is widely used for PCa screening, but it lacks specificity and can lead to over-diagnosis and over-treatment. New, effective and affordable markers are therefore needed.
resultsUsing enzymatic methyl sequencing (EM-Seq), methylation-specific PCR (MS-PCR), and transcriptomics including a spatial approach, we analyzed tumor and non-tumor samples from radical prostatectomy specimens. Comprehensive methylome was performed in 15 paired samples of prostate cancer and their adjacent non-tumor tissue by EM-Seq. From over 4-million differentially methylated CpG sites, we identified 66 CpGs sites representing eight genes: CLDN5, GSTP1, NBEAL2, PRICKLE2, SALL3, TAMALIN/GRASP, TJP2, and TMEM106A which were hypermethylated in PCa tissues (p-value < 0.0001), and were confirmed by MS-PCR. A very good correlation between EM-Seq and MS-PCR results was observed (Pearson's correlation of 0.93). Differential expression of these candidate genes was analyzed first, using an Affymetrix RNA array dataset from a cohort of 68 non-tumor samples and 101 tumors with different aggressiveness patterns and, second, by in situ expression using Visium 10X spatial genomics transcriptomics on eight prostate tissue sections with different tumor grades and non-tumor glands. Lower expression level was found, using RNA arrays, in tumor compared to non-tumor tissues for six of the eight genes (p ≤ 0.0001) and in tumor glands with high aggressiveness compared to non-tumor glands (p < 0.0001) for the eight genes using in situ transcriptomics.
conclusionsOur study identifies promising DNA methylation markers for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.