ArticleCancer cell international2025
Comparison of local effects and systemic T-cell responses in patients with breast cancer treated by radiofrequency ablation versus microwave ablation.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-guided microwave ablation for breast tumors: current status and future perspectives.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Review
- Exploring the applicability, combined strategies, and challenges of ablation in hematology based on its characteristics and immunomodulatory mechanisms.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Risk factors and immune landscape of early local tumor progression after microwave ablation for lung cancer: a retrospective nested case-control study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- In Situ Vaccination by Tumor Ablation: Principles and Prospects for Systemic Antitumor Immunity.Vaccines · 2025Review
- Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation and Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients with Benign Breast Tumors.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) have been investigated as treatments for early-stage breast cancer. However, it is unclear which minimally invasive thermal therapy demonstrates superior local efficacy. Also, the cytolytic functions of peripheral T cells after thermal ablation in solid tumors have not been reported. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, 60 patients with breast cancer were enrolled from two clinical trials conducted between March 2020 and December 2021. The local effect of thermal ablation evaluated through pathological examinations or radiological imaging was the primary outcome. The secondary outcome involved systemic T-cell responses. Peripheral blood samples were collected before and after treatments. The ablation-induced immune responses were analyzed using flow cytometry, enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA), quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and single-cell RNA sequencing.
resultsBoth RFA and MWA showed favorable local effects in the treatment of breast cancer. Compared to surgery, RFA increased peripheral CD8 + T-cell proportions but did not enhance their cytolytic functions. Conversely, MWA induced stronger cytolytic functions of peripheral T cells and upregulated memory CD4 + T cells. The distinct immune responses induced by MWA and RFA were associated with variations in antigen presentation pathways, types of antigen-presenting cells (APCs), and cytokine secretion profiles. Single-cell RNA sequencing further revealed that dendritic cells were the APCs activated by MWA, exhibiting upregulated fatty acid metabolism.
conclusionBoth thermal ablation therapies are technically feasible for early-stage breast cancer. However, MWA appears superior in enhancing the cytolytic functions of peripheral T cells compared to RFA. This study provides the first mechanistic insight into the different immune responses induced by MWA and RFA, although future clinical trials are necessary to validate these findings.
trial registrationChiCTR2000029665. Registered February 09, 2020 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=48315 ) and ChiCTR2000029155. Registered January 16, 2020 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=48314 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.