ArticleBMC medical ethics2025
Experiences of internship nursing students in confronting ethical issues: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The cognitive and ethical crossroads: a qualitative study of academic integrity, emotional landscapes, and generative AI integration in nursing education.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Evaluation of "nursing ethics-professional teaching" integrated ward-round in practicing nursing students: a practical study.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Nurse-Patient Therapeutic Interaction Scale (NuPTIS): a translation and validation study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Exploring the integration of AI and national quality courses in China: a study on teaching practices in nursing smart education.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Strategies to Safeguard Mental Health Among Medical and Allied Health Trainees: A Narrative Review.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in science and technology have turned the modern healthcare system into a challenging environment with many ethical dilemmas. Internship nursing students experience many ethical issues in the clinical environment. The present study explored the experiences of Iranian internship nursing students in confronting ethical issues.
methodsThe present study is a qualitative inquiry with a conventional content analysis approach. A total of 15 internship nursing students (six females and nine males, semesters 7 and 8) were selected via purposive sampling with maximum variation from the nursing and midwifery faculty at Golestan University of Medical Sciences, northern Iran. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews over eight months. Graneheim and Lundman’s qualitative conventional content analysis approach was used for data analysis. MAXQDA version 2022 was utilized for data management. The trustworthiness of the data was ensured by four criteria given by Lincoln and Guba.
resultsQualitative data analysis led to 792 initial codes, which were reduced to 262 after removing duplicates. Subsequent analysis resulted in 7 sub-categories and 3 main categories, including “Insufficient Ethical Preparation,” “Inadequate Ethical Reasoning Skills,” and “An Ineffective Ethical Atmosphere in the Clinical Environment.” Ultimately, the main theme of “Limited Ethical Maturity of Students in Ethical Issues” was extracted.
conclusionInternship nursing students enter the educational environment with inadequate preparation and limited ethical maturity, which often leads to passive behavior when faced with ethical issues. Considering the non-educational clinical environment and the identified issues in the academic structure, reviewing the curriculum of professional ethics in nursing in Iran seems necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.