Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646542›Full record

ReviewBMC oral health2025

Oral health literacy from a person-centered focus in the United States: a narrative review.

Kelly L Schroeder, Caroline McLeod, Stephanie Clester, Hanna J Cheung, Lisa J Heaton, Eric P Tranby

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kelly L SchroederProgram Evaluation Specialist, Analytics and Data Insights, CareQuest Institute for Oral Health, 465 Medford Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA, 02129, USA. KSchroeder@carequest.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-2269
Caroline McLeodValue-Based Care Solutions Manager, Health Transformation , CareQuest Insitute for Oral Health, Boston, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-3928
Stephanie ClesterClinical Content and Education Specialist, Education, CareQuest Institute for Oral Health, 465 Medford Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA, 02129, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1587-7552
Hanna J CheungHealth Science Specialist, Analytics and Data Insights, CareQuest Institute for Oral Health, 465 Medford Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA, 02129, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7994-3555
Lisa J HeatonScience Writer, Analytics and Data Insights, CareQuest Institute for Oral Health, 465 Medford Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA, 02129, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2670-7402
Eric P TranbyDirector, Analytics and Data Insights, CareQuest Institute for Oral Health, 465 Medford Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA, 02129, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3854-7162

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of oral health literacy (OHL) is well recognized in the literature as a contributing factor to poor oral and systemic health outcomes. Oral health literacy is a combination of knowledge and skills acquired over time through oral health experiences. An OHL framework helps identify barriers related to OHL such as individual demographics, environmental factors, and access to oral health information. This framework will be used to examine who in the literature is being measured for OHL, explore the various interventions for improved OHL, and investigate who should be held responsible for improving OHL.

methodsEvidence-based, peer reviewed, manuscripts were examined to determine who is being measured for OHL and who is responsible for improving OHL and oral health outcomes. Electronic databases, PubMed, Google Scholar, ProQuest Health and Medicine, and EBSCO Complete were searched for literature published on OHL from 2018-2024. Four reviewers screened manuscripts for inclusion/exclusion criteria and categorized manuscripts according to OHL subject, OHL interventions, and OHL provider.

resultsOut of 12,961 manuscripts, 58 met inclusion criteria and were reviewed and categorized according to the OHL population focus, OHL intervention or measure type, and who was recommended to provide future OHL skills. From these main categories, parents and caregivers were most often measured for OHL with an OHL survey instrument. When interventions were applied, they generally consisted of oral health education and behavioral modification. The responsibility for improved OHL was most often placed on medical and dental providers.

conclusionsOHL is a highly researched topic in the literature. However, OHL is often focused on one social identity, such as being a caregiver or a particular race/ethnicity. Power dynamics between patients and providers, and within communities and health care systems can further perpetuate challenges with improving OHL and positive oral health experiences. Using an OHL framework, which includes identifying multiple social identities and recognizing environmental barriers, can help identify individuals who would benefit from assistance in improving their OHL.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyOral HealthHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansUnited StatesAccess to oral health careIntersectionalityOral health educationOral health literacy

Identifiers

PMID40646542
PMCPMC12255081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.