Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646538›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2025

"Age independent, but person dependent": a Swiss interview-based study on the meaning of good parenthood at an advanced parental age.

Nathalie Bettina Neeser, Andrea Martani, Veerle Provoost, Guido Pennings, Bernice Simone Elger, Christian De Geyter, Nicolas Vulliemoz, Tenzin Wangmo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathalie Bettina NeeserInstitute for Biomedical Ethics (IBMB), University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, Basel, 4056, Switzerland. nathalie.neeser@unibas.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-6283-6810
Andrea MartaniInstitute for Biomedical Ethics (IBMB), University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, Basel, 4056, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2113-1002
Veerle ProvoostDepartment of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4451-3425
Guido PenningsDepartment of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0754-8055
Bernice Simone ElgerInstitute for Biomedical Ethics (IBMB), University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, Basel, 4056, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4249-7399
Christian De GeyterReproductive Medicine and Gynaecological Endocrinology (RME), University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0889-6310
Nicolas VulliemozCentre de Procréation Médicalement Assistée (CPMA), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0487-9377
Tenzin WangmoInstitute for Biomedical Ethics (IBMB), University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, Basel, 4056, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0857-0510

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek FWO.ORP2021.0001.01Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 10001AL_197415 / 1, project title 'Family Building at Advanced Parental Age: An Interdisciplinary Approach'
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChild welfare is one of the most important topics when it comes to parenting competence and the definition of good parenthood. This is widely discussed, especially in the context of treatment considerations for medically assisted reproduction (MAR) for patients of Advanced Parental Age (APA, here defined as 40 years and older). The aim of this study is to contribute to the exploration of how different stakeholders in this context envision the concept of good parenthood.

methodsAn explorative semi-structured interview study was conducted with a total of 15 healthcare providers, 12 aspiring APA-parents, 21 APA-parents and 20 adult offspring of APA-parents.

resultsAfter thematic analysis, results show that although the connecting focal point among participant groups is reproductive age, participants consistently emphasized that APA is not a determining factor to define a "good" parent. Instead, we identified three themes representing participants' views on this topic: (i) the difficulties in defining good parenthood; (ii) the family structure and context as inherent to parenting quality; and (iii) good parents as conscious adapters.

conclusionsParticipants expressed their views that good parenthood depends on the personality of the parent, rather than on one single characteristic of a parent, such as age. Our results challenge the focus on a singular parental characteristic in safeguarding the welfare of future children and therefore also the role currently attributed to parental age in decisions about access to MAR.

Indexed as

Child WelfareParentingParentsReproductive Techniques, AssistedAdultAdult ChildrenFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSwitzerlandAdvanced parental ageAgeingChild welfareEthicsParenthoodQualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID40646538
PMCPMC12247432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.