Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646512›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Exploring student perceptions of the Osmosis digital learning platform in undergraduate medical education and its influences on motivation and inclusivity.

Sanat Kulkarni, Erin Lawson-Smith, Laura Mongan, Rachel Westacott, Dawn Jackson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sanat KulkarniCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. sxk568@student.bham.ac.uk.
Erin Lawson-SmithCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Laura MonganCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Rachel WestacottCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Dawn JacksonCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing incorporation of digital learning platforms has transformed pedagogical approaches in medical education. However, these tools are under-researched and under-theorised. In the 2022/23 academic year, an asynchronous, personalised digital learning tool (Osmosis) was provided to all medical students at one of the largest medical schools in the United Kingdom. We explored students' experience of digital learning platforms, including Osmosis, and their influences on student motivation and inclusion.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study of second to final year medical students at the University of Birmingham. Data were collected through 10 semi-structured interviews and one focus group. The fifteen participants were purposively sampled based on year group, gender, ethnicity, international student status, self-reported health challenges, caring responsibilities and financial difficulties. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using the Framework Method. Data were analysed through the lens of self-determination theory (SDT) which focuses on the psychological needs of autonomy, self-efficacy and interconnectedness for achieving intrinsic motivation.

resultsFive overarching themes were identified in relation to digital learning tools: (1) navigating complexity within the digital learning environment, (2) benefits and pitfalls of autonomous digital learning, (3) efficiency and depth in learning and promoting self-confidence, (4) social influences on digital learning and (5) curriculum level considerations. Aligned to SDT, digital tools promoted students' autonomy, self-efficacy and relatedness thereby facilitating intrinsic motivation. Online tools, including the Osmosis platform, supported student inclusivity and accessibility, helping students overcome health and learning challenges. However, lack of formal guidance towards online platforms, misalignment to the local curriculum and concerns over reliability were key barriers to their use.

conclusionDigital learning tools play an increasingly important role within modern medical education, positively impacting student motivation and inclusion. Nevertheless, greater focus must be placed on providing local guidance in accessing such tools, alongside constructively aligning their integration with other elements of the curriculum. Retaining medical students is vital to the future of patient care and it is ever more critical that higher education institutions prioritise student motivation, inclusion and wellbeing. Optimising integration of digital learning platforms therefore may be one means of achieving this. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionEducation, Medical, UndergraduateMotivationStudents, MedicalAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomYoung AdultDigital learningE-learningLearning motivationMedical educationOnline learningQualitative researchSelf-determination theorySelf-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID40646512
PMCPMC12255063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.