ArticleBMC medical education2025
Spaced repetition and other key factors influencing medical school entrance exam success: insights from a French survey.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFirst-year medical candidates encounter steep learning demands when transitioning from high school to university. Spaced repetition– a method of distributing review sessions over time– improves long-term memory retention. This study assessed its effectiveness alongside lifestyle and academic factors in students preparing for the medical school entrance examination.
methodsIn 2023, all 618 candidates at the University of Rouen were invited to complete a post-exam, self-administered questionnaire; 523 responded (84.6%). We collected data on revision methods (e.g., spaced repetition, reviewing archives of previous exams), participation in private preparatory classes and summer courses, lifestyle behaviors (e.g., sleep duration, physical activity or smoking), and secondary-school grades. Predictors of success were identified through univariate analyses. A multivariate logistic regression was then conducted to determine independent predictors of success.
resultsOf 523 respondents, 134 (25.6%) passed the entrance exam. In univariate analysis, successful candidates significantly more often used spaced repetition (44.8% vs. 20.3%; p < 0.001), reviewed archives of previous exams, attended private preparatory classes or summer courses, and had higher secondary-school grades. In multivariate logistic regression, independent predictors of success included spaced repetition (aOR 2.09; 95% CI, 1.16–3.48), secondary-school grades (aOR 3.19; 95% CI, 2.33–4.37), private preparatory class attendance (aOR 2.02; 95% CI, 1.11–3.66), sleep duration (aOR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.12–1.99), and regular sport practice (aOR 1.81; 95% CI, 1.13–2.93).
conclusionsAdmission success in the medical school entrance examination appeared to be influenced by multiple factors: while spaced repetition significantly enhanced performance, academic background, private preparatory classes, and healthy lifestyle habits also contributed. These findings support integrating validated study techniques and wellness strategies into university support programs for entrance examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.