Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646485›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Prevalence of visual impairment and refractive error-related risk factors in preschool children in beijing, China.

Yunyun Sun, Bidan Zhu, Lei Li, Huijian Li, Yuan Qiu, Shana Wang, Xi Qin, Jiantao Cui, Meixia Jiang, Yuanbin Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Changing Natural History of Anisometropia: A Scoping Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yunyun SunBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, No1. Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Bidan ZhuTongzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, China.
Lei LiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, No1. Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Huijian LiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, No1. Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Yuan QiuBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, No1. Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Shana WangTongzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, China.
Xi QinTongzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, China.
Jiantao CuiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, No1. Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Meixia JiangBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, No1. Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Yuanbin LiBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, No1. Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Weibin ChenBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, No1. Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
Jing FuBeijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences Key Laboratory, No1. Dongjiaominxiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China. fu_jing@126.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82070998National Natural Science Foundation of China 82301250Science and Technology Incubation Project of Beijing Hospital Management Center PX2024007Talent Development Plan for Beijing High-level Public Health Technical Project Discipline Leader-02-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood vision loss represents a significant public health burden worldwide, with the majority of these cases being treatable or preventable if identified early. This study aimed to investigate the contemporary prevalence, causes and refractive error-related risk factors of visual impairment among preschool children in Beijing, China.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, preschool children aged 36 to 83 months were enrolled to undergo comprehensive ocular examinations, including visual acuity, autorefraction before and after cycloplegia (1% cyclopentolate), ocular biometry, anterior segment examination, and cover and uncover test. Visual impairment (VI) was classified according to the Pediatric Eye Evaluations Preferred Practice Pattern guidelines, which define it as presenting visual acuity (PVA) in either eye exceeding 0.4, 0.3, and 0.2 logMAR for respective age groups of 36-47, 48-59, and 60-83 months, and an interocular difference (IOD) of two or more lines in PVA.

resultsThis study included 1,473 children with an average age of 4.89 ± 0.76 years; 52.5% were boys. The mean PVA for the worse-seeing eyes across the age groups 36-47, 48-59, 60-71, and 72-83 months were 0.29 ± 0.11, 0.22 ± 0.11, 0.18 ± 0.11, and 0.14 ± 0.11, respectively (ANOVA; P < 0.01). For the better-seeing eyes, the mean PVA were 0.24 ± 0.10, 0.17 ± 0.09, 0.13 ± 0.09, and 0.09 ± 0.10 (ANOVA; P < 0.01). The overall prevalence of VI was 17.99% in worse-seeing eyes, 8.83% in better-seeing eyes, and 1.77% for IOD. No significant differences were observed between boys and girls in mean PVA and the prevalence of VI. The primary causes of VI were refractive errors, including astigmatism (24.2%), hyperopia (19.6%), myopia (9.1%), and anisometropia (6.4%), followed by amblyopia (9.8%) and strabismus (2.3%). Factors associated with VI, as determined through both univariate and multivariate analyses, included older age (OR = 1.472, P < 0.01), greater absolute value of cylinder (OR = 5.691, P < 0.01), myopia (OR = 85.432, P < 0.01), and anisometropia (OR = 3.805, P = 0.02).

conclusionsThis extensive study provides contemporary insights into the prevalence and causes of VI in preschool children in Beijing, China. The findings reveal a higher prevalence of VI compared to previous reports from Western countries, highlighting the critical need for ocular screening in preschool children and support from local governments to promote early prevention strategies against refractive errors.

Indexed as

Refractive ErrorsVision DisordersBeijingChildChild, PreschoolChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsVisual AcuityAmblyopiaAstigmatismPreschool childrenRefractive errorVisual acuityVisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID40646485
PMCPMC12247378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.