ArticleBMC nursing2025
Midwives' experiences in the clinical management of oxytocin infusion for labor induction and augmentation: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMidwives play a central role in administering oxytocin for labor induction and augmentation. Understanding their experiences with oxytocin management can provide valuable insights for refining administration protocols and improving clinical outcomes.
methodsThis exploratory qualitative study, guided by a descriptive phenomenological approach, employed semi-structured interviews to explore midwives' experiences with oxytocin infusion for labor induction and augmentation. Between December 2023 and May 2024, a total of 15 clinical midwives from 10 hospitals in Guangdong Province, China, participated in the study. Data were analyzed using Colaizzi's seven-step method with NVivo 12.0 software.
resultsThree key themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Clinical Alertness versus Systemic Vulnerabilities, (2) Professional Fulfillment versus Loss of Autonomy, and (3) Accumulated Experience versus Lack of Guidelines. These themes underscore critical factors contributing to emotional burden, safety concerns, and teamwork challenges in oxytocin management, and highlight the potential risks to maternal and neonatal safety in clinical practice.
conclusionsMissed nursing care is a recurrent issue in the administration of oxytocin for labor induction and augmentation. Despite demonstrating competence in managing oxytocin, midwives face challenges such as limited decision-making authority, ambiguous clinical guidelines, and insufficient standardized training. To address these gaps, healthcare institutions should prioritize the development of clear, evidence-based clinical protocols for oxytocin use and implement regular, standardized training programs to enhance midwives' skills and confidence. Furthermore, empowering midwives with greater decision-making autonomy and promoting effective communication within multidisciplinary teams are essential steps toward improving the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.