ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Family visits among nursing home residents during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Loneliness and Psychosocial Well-Being in Nursing Homes: A Cross-Sectional Study of Older Adults.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Companion Value Co-Creation and Well-Being in Older Adults with Chronic Illness: A Cross-Sectional Dyadic Study in Spain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLoneliness is common among nursing home residents, with decreased social connectedness being linked to an increased risk of mortality. During the COVID-19 pandemic, new modalities for family visits, such as videoconferencing, became available in addition to in-person visits, potentially helping to reduce loneliness. This study aimed to characterize family visits among nursing home residents during the COVID-19 pandemic and investigate their associated factors.
methodsData on the visits, including their modalities, were retrospectively collected from facility records for residents of 4 nursing homes over a 3-month period from 2020 to 2022. The types of visits included in-person visits through acrylic boards or windows and video calls. We evaluated the association between resident characteristics and whether they received any visits, regardless of the modality of visit, using a multivariable logistic regression model.
resultsThe study included 564 participants (mean age, 84.9 years; female, 70.0%); among them, 33.2% were visited, 72.2% of which had video calls. Participants who used video calls (1.1 ± 0.9 times per month) had significantly higher frequencies of visits than those with in-person visits only (0.6 ± 0.5 times) (p < 0.001). Most visitors used video calls, although older visitors were less likely to use video calls than younger visitors (60.0% vs. 80.7%, p = 0.021). Compared to residents who stayed for less than 1 year, those staying 1-1.9 years were more likely to receive family visits (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 2.18, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.38-3.44, p = 0.001), while those staying 2 years or longer were less likely to receive such visits (aOR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.31-0.91, p = 0.021). None of the other variables, including dementia diagnosis, age, sex, and Barthel Index score, were shown to be associated with family visits.
conclusionThis study suggests that video calls were widely used for family visits among residents and visitors of nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic. For residents with no or infrequent family visits, such as those with shorter or longer lengths of stay, it may be necessary to encourage family engagement and actively incorporate alternative approaches to promote social engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.