ArticleHealth economics review2025
Cost-effectiveness analysis of penpulimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic squamous non-small-cell lung cancer in China.
Article in Health economics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line penpulimab plus chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Cost-utility and budget impact analyses of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors in Thailand.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line treatments for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer in China: an economic evaluation based on network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSquamous NSCLC (sqNSCLC), a subtype with few targetable mutations, is often diagnosed at advanced stages. Platinum-based chemo-therapy, the first-line treatment, yields median overall survival (OS) of less than or equal to one year, underscoring the need for better therapies. Penpulimab, a novel PD-1 inhibitor developed in China, is a humanized IgG1 antibody with a modified Fc region. Phase III trial data (AK105-302) showed penpulimab + carboplatin-paclitaxel (PEN-CP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in metastatic sqNSCLC vs. placebo (CP), with a favorable safety profile. However, its high cost and lack of cost-effectiveness analyses warrant further study. This research evaluates PEN-CP's cost-effectiveness vs. CP from the Chinese healthcare perspective.
methodsA three-state Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of PEN-CP as a first-line treatment for metastatic sqNSCLC. Clinical efficacy data were sourced from the AK105-302 trial, while drug costs were derived from national tender prices. Additional costs and health utilities were obtained from published literature. The primary outcomes included total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). To assess the robustness of the findings, both one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.
resultsCompared to CP, the ICER for PEN-CP was $14,918.81 per QALY. The ICER values were below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38,060.00 per QALY. The key drivers of the model outcomes were the price of penpulimab, the PFS stage utility value, and the cost of optimal supportive care.
conclusionsFrom the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, penpulimab combined with first-line chemotherapy demonstrates is cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38,060.00 per QALY for patients with metastatic sqNSCLC and represents a promising first-line treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.