ArticleHealth economics review2025
Exploring patient and provider perspectives on health insurance effectiveness in cameroon: a qualitative study.
Article in Health economics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global push to achieve universal health coverage (UHC) by 2030 has gained widespread attention, with many countries, including low- and middle-income nations like Cameroon, striving to implement reforms. However, financial, infrastructural, and systemic barriers make achieving UHC in Cameroon challenging. In pursuit of this goal, health insurance systems, particularly private health insurance, have been increasingly promoted to reduce out-of-pocket health expenses. However, the key question remains whether patients receive value for their money. This study aimed to examine the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers on the effectiveness of health insurance in Cameroon, with a focus on awareness, satisfaction, and the challenges influencing its accessibility and functionality.
methodFollowing ethical approvals, this study employed a qualitative exploratory design, using key informant interviews (KII) to examine the perspectives of patients and healthcare providers on the effectiveness of health insurance in Cameroon. The study focused on awareness, satisfaction, and challenges influencing accessibility and functionality. Reflective thematic analysis was used to identify important aspects of our study.
resultTo ensure that the identified themes accurately represented the data and remained distinct, they were systematically reviewed and refined. This process resulted in five main themes: (1) Accessibility and Quality of Healthcare Services, (2) The Financial Paradox of Health Insurance, (3) Structural and Operational Challenges in the Health Insurance Framework, (4) Information Gaps and Awareness about Health Insurance, and (5) Divergent Experiences and Perspectives on Health Insurance Effectiveness. All participants agreed that health insurance reduces out-of-pocket health costs. Uninsured patients cited high premiums, distrust in the healthcare system, and insufficient knowledge about insurance options as reasons for not enrolling. Insured patients expressed significant dissatisfaction with their insurance packages, particularly with lengthy reimbursement processes and inadequate medical coverage.
conclusionThe findings indicate a general agreement on the benefits of health insurance in Cameroon. To improve enrolment and satisfaction, premiums need to be made affordable across all socioeconomic levels, and consider increasing information dissemination and publicity about insurance options. Streamlining reimbursement processes is also crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.