Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646358›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2025

Pseudomonas sp. F204 Promoted Tomato Growth and Altered Rhizosphere Bacteria Community.

Jiawei Li, Yingjie A, Minghao Liu, Xin Li, Yilin Zhan, Muhammad Khashi U Rahman, Xingang Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiawei LiKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Heilongjiang Key Laboratory of Cold Area Protected Horticulture, Department of Horticulture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.
Yingjie AKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Heilongjiang Key Laboratory of Cold Area Protected Horticulture, Department of Horticulture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.
Minghao LiuSchool for the Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA.
Xin LiKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Heilongjiang Key Laboratory of Cold Area Protected Horticulture, Department of Horticulture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.
Yilin ZhanCollege of Agriculture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.
Muhammad Khashi U RahmanKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Heilongjiang Key Laboratory of Cold Area Protected Horticulture, Department of Horticulture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China. khashiurahman@yahoo.com.
Xingang ZhouKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs), Heilongjiang Key Laboratory of Cold Area Protected Horticulture, Department of Horticulture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, 150030, China.

Funding

the European Commission under Marie Skłodowska-Curie Program 101034371the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32272792
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular DNA (eDNA), as a potential plant autotoxin, can cause soil sickness, negatively affecting plant growth and reducing crop yield. Some microbial taxa can degrade eDNA; however, the effect of these bacteria on plant growth and rhizosphere microbial communities is unknown. In this study, eDNA-degrading bacterial strains were screened from soils, and their eDNA-degrading ability and plant-growth-promoting characteristics were tested in vitro. The effects of the most potent eDNA-degrading strain on tomato plant growth were assessed, and changes in the rhizosphere bacterial community were analyzed using high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Among a total of more than 600 isolated strains, Pseudomonas sp. F204 showed the strongest eDNA-degradation capacity and exhibited phosphate solubilization, siderophore, and indole-3-acetic acid production abilities. Pot experiment showed that inoculation of Pseudomonas sp. F204 significantly altered tomato rhizosphere bacterial community structure and composition, and stimulated the growth of tomato seedlings. Overall, this study shows that eDNA-degrading bacteria can alter rhizosphere bacterial community and promote plant growth, and highlights the important role of soil microbial community in alleviating autotoxicity in continuous cropping systems.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPseudomonasRhizosphereSoil MicrobiologySolanum lycopersicumBacteriaDNA, BacterialIndoleacetic AcidsPlant RootsDNA, Bacterialindoleacetic acidIndoleacetic Acids

Identifiers

PMID40646358
PMCPMC12254067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.