Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646303›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Human and artificial visual systems share a computational principle for transforming binocular disparity into depth representation.

Bayu Gautama Wundari, Ichiro Fujita, Hiroshi Ban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bayu Gautama WundariGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5057-0082
Ichiro FujitaGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Japan.
Hiroshi BanGraduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita, Japan. ban.hiroshi@nict.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6839-3216

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) 21H00968Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) 21K18572Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) 23K17462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our visual brain transforms small differences between images in the two eyes (binocular disparity) into coherent depth. Initially, neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) compute the degrees of overlap between the left and right images to encode disparity. Such cross-correlation-like neurons respond to both binocularly matched and mismatched features. This ambiguous representation is refined along the visual pathway through a cross-matching computation involving additional nonlinear processing to filter out mismatches. How these representations are organized in the human visual cortex remains unclear. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we show that areas V1-V3 exhibit stronger cross-correlation components, while V3A/B, V7, hV4, and hMT+ are inclined towards cross-matching. A deep neural network (DNN) trained for stereo vision undergoes a similar transformation across its layers, progressing through distinct phases that exploit dissimilar features to achieve coherent depth. This brain-DNN alignment demonstrates that human and artificial visual systems share a computational principle for robust 3D vision.

Indexed as

Depth PerceptionPrimary Visual CortexVision, BinocularVision DisparityVisual CortexAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural Networks, ComputerVisual Pathways

Identifiers

PMID40646303
PMCPMC12254370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.