Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646272›Full record

ArticleMikrochimica acta2025

Dummy imprinted electrochemical sensor for the selective detection of camostat mesylate.

Ahmet Cetinkaya, M Altay Unal, M Emin Çorman, Lokman Uzun, Sibel A Ozkan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mikrochimica acta, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmet CetinkayaDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. ahmet.cetinkya@yahoo.com.
M Altay UnalStem Cell Institute, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
M Emin ÇormanDepartment of Biochemistry, Gülhane Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.
Lokman UzunDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Sibel A OzkanDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. ozkan@pharmacy.ankara.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) and dummy-imprinted polymer (DIP) sensors were designed and comparatively analyzed for the determination of camostat mesylate (CAM). MIP and DIP sensors were designed with CAM, guanidine (GUA), and dimethylformamide (DMF) as target molecules and para-aminobenzoic acid (p-ABA) as a functional monomer using the electropolymerization (EP) method on the surface of screen-printed gold electrodes (SPAuE). The created sensors' morphological and electrochemical characteristics were examined to verify their construction. Additionally, the alterations on the electrode surface at the molecular and electronic levels were assessed using quantum chemistry calculations. The dynamic linear range of the MIP-based sensors designed under optimized experimental conditions was 2.5 × 10

Indexed as

Electrochemical TechniquesMolecularly Imprinted PolymersElectrodesGoldLimit of DetectionMolecular ImprintingGoldMolecularly Imprinted PolymersCamostat mesylateDimethylformamideDummy imprinted polymersElectropolymerizationGuanidineScreen-printed gold electrode

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.