ArticleEye (London, England)2025
Oral fundus fluorescein angiogram detects reactivation post anti-VEGF in aggressive retinopathy of prematurity.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Video-Indirect Fluorescein Angiofusion (VIFA): an emerging imaging technique for retinal vasculature.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveUtility, safety, and feasibility study of office-based Non-contact Ultra widefield Oral Fundus Fluorescein Dye Angiography (NC-UWF-OFDA) to assess disease reactivation in babies treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for Aggressive Retinopathy of Prematurity (A-ROP).
methodsEyes clinically suspected to have a possible or definite reactivation after anti-VEGF injection were included in this pilot study. NC-UWF-OFDA was performed in the office setting. Imaging was done prospectively in preterm babies with A-ROP injected with anti-VEGF. OFDA images were analysed for signs of reactivation.
resultsA total of 20 eyes of 10 preterm babies treated with anti-VEGF underwent NC-UWF-OFDA imaging. The OFDA images were analysed to assess the pattern and dynamics of retinal vasculature with a special focus on detecting the active new vessels through leakage, the pattern of vasculature at the vascular avascular (V-Av) junction, and delineation of the persistent avascular retina (PAR). Seven eyes were confirmed with reactivation of ROP requiring treatment while the rest were followed up. None of the subjects had dye or procedure-related systemic adverse events.
conclusionNC-UWF-OFDA is safe and effective in the diagnosis of reactivation of ROP following anti-VEGF injections. A better appreciation of retinal vascular dynamics with accurate delineation of the posterior extent of capillary non-perfusion areas, PAR, and early definitive detection of active neovascularization helped in formulating the extent of laser treatment needed including intraoperatively. This helped us avoid unnecessary parenteral injections/general anaesthesia for evaluation of disease reactivation and helped avoid over-treatment of cases having clinical suspicion of reactivation during fundoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.