ArticleScientific reports2025
Quality and content evaluation of thyroid eye disease treatment information on TikTok and Bilibili.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the quality and reliability of rotator cuff injury related videos on Bilibili and TikTok: A cross-sectional analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of cervical spondylotic myelopathy-related content on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional analysis.Medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the quality and reliability of DILI in Chinese videos on TikTok (Douyin) and BiliBili: cross-sectional content analysis study.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Myocarditis-related videos on TikTok: a cross-sectional analysis of content quality and user engagement.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of osteoporosis-related health information on short-video platforms: a multi-source cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Quality and content evaluation of anal fistula information on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Quality and reliability of information about blood glucose monitoring on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional analysis.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of anxiety disorder-related short videos on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the content quality and trustworthiness of snakebite envenomation videos on social media platforms: insights from TikTok and Bilibili.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of short videos about long COVID on bilibili and tiktok: cross-sectional study under health community construction background in China.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of pediatric inguinal hernia treatment information on TikTok and Bilibili.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- The quality and reliability of short videos about choledocholithiasis on TikTok and Bilibili in China.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- A cross-sectional study on the quality of pediatric autism-related videos on short video platforms.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quality and dissemination of nasopharyngeal cancer health information on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-sectional study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Quality, interaction, and platform-creator heterogeneity of DR short videos on Douyin and Bilibili: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thyroid eye disease (TED) is an autoimmune condition that commonly impacts patients' visual function, appearance, and psychological well-being. Challenges in TED management include low early detection rates and large variation in treatment response. Video platforms like TikTok and Bilibili are increasingly utilized for health information dissemination, yet the quality of TED treatment content on these platforms varies significantly. This cross-sectional study collected videos on "" from TikTok and Bilibili in March 2025. After applying exclusion criteria, 152 videos (89 from TikTok, 63 from Bilibili) were analyzed. Quality, reliability, and educational value were assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria. Additionally, the study analyzed video content integrity, uploader identity, and the correlation with user interaction data. TikTok videos scored higher in quality (GQS: 3.00 ± 0.58; mDISCERN: 3.17 ± 0.73) compared to Bilibili (GQS: 2.65 ± 0.65; mDISCERN: 2.21 ± 0.88; p < 0.001). On Bilibili, 62% of videos were uploaded by Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) physicians, yet these scored lower in quality. Professionally uploaded content, particularly by ophthalmologists, outperformed non-professional videos (e.g., patient). However, the video interaction metrics uploaded by patients showed better performance. In terms of content, only 27% addressed staged treatment, and 11.8% mentioned risk factor control. Correlation analysis revealed strong correlations between interaction data, but interaction data have no correlation with GQS, mDISCERN, and PEMAT scores. Short video platforms exhibit a dual role in the dissemination of TED treatment information: enhancing public awareness of diseases through professional content while risking misinformation due to inadequate auditing. Recommended interventions include robust platform certification, active involvement of medical organizations in content creation, and public education on prioritizing verified sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.