Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646154›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Quality and content evaluation of thyroid eye disease treatment information on TikTok and Bilibili.

Haisheng Wang, Huahong Zhang, Jiamin Cao, Feng Zhang, Wei Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haisheng WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Huahong ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Jiamin CaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China.
Feng ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. fengz2022@csu.edu.cn.
Wei XiongDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 138 Tongzipo Road, Yuelu District, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China. weixiong420@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thyroid eye disease (TED) is an autoimmune condition that commonly impacts patients' visual function, appearance, and psychological well-being. Challenges in TED management include low early detection rates and large variation in treatment response. Video platforms like TikTok and Bilibili are increasingly utilized for health information dissemination, yet the quality of TED treatment content on these platforms varies significantly. This cross-sectional study collected videos on "" from TikTok and Bilibili in March 2025. After applying exclusion criteria, 152 videos (89 from TikTok, 63 from Bilibili) were analyzed. Quality, reliability, and educational value were assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria. Additionally, the study analyzed video content integrity, uploader identity, and the correlation with user interaction data. TikTok videos scored higher in quality (GQS: 3.00 ± 0.58; mDISCERN: 3.17 ± 0.73) compared to Bilibili (GQS: 2.65 ± 0.65; mDISCERN: 2.21 ± 0.88; p < 0.001). On Bilibili, 62% of videos were uploaded by Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) physicians, yet these scored lower in quality. Professionally uploaded content, particularly by ophthalmologists, outperformed non-professional videos (e.g., patient). However, the video interaction metrics uploaded by patients showed better performance. In terms of content, only 27% addressed staged treatment, and 11.8% mentioned risk factor control. Correlation analysis revealed strong correlations between interaction data, but interaction data have no correlation with GQS, mDISCERN, and PEMAT scores. Short video platforms exhibit a dual role in the dissemination of TED treatment information: enhancing public awareness of diseases through professional content while risking misinformation due to inadequate auditing. Recommended interventions include robust platform certification, active involvement of medical organizations in content creation, and public education on prioritizing verified sources.

Indexed as

Graves OphthalmopathyInformation DisseminationPatient Education as TopicCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsVideo RecordingBilibiliInformation qualityPatient educationPublic healthSocial mediaThyroid eye diseaseTikTok

Identifiers

PMID40646154
PMCPMC12254225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.