Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646143›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Improved model MASW YOLO for small target detection in UAV images based on YOLOv8.

Xianghe Meng, Fei Yuan, Dexiang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xianghe MengCollege of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Anhui University, Hefei, 230601, China.
Fei YuanInstitute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Dexiang ZhangCollege of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Anhui University, Hefei, 230601, China. dqxyzdx@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present paper proposes an algorithmic model, MASW-YOLO, that improves YOLOv8n. This model aims to address the problems of small targets, missed detection, and misdetection of UAV viewpoint feature detection targets. The backbone network structure is enhanced by incorporating a multi-scale convolutional MSCA attention mechanism, which introduces a deep convolution process to aggregate local information. This method aims to increase small-target detection accuracy. Concurrently, the neck network structure is reconstructed, with the fusion effect of multi-scale weakening of non-adjacent levels addressed by using an AFPN progressive pyramid network to replace the PANFPN structure of the base model. The MSCA and AFPN form a multiscale feature synergy mechanism, whereby the response values of MSCA become inputs to AFPN, and the multiscale integration of AFPN further amplifies the advantages of MSCA. The use of flexible non-maximum suppression Soft-NMS is chosen to replace the non-maximum suppression NMS to improve the model's detection of occlusion and dense targets. The loss function of the model is optimised through the implementation of Wise-IoU, which serves as a replacement for the loss function of the baseline model, thereby enhancing the accuracy of bounding box regression, especially perform better when the target deformation or scale change is large. Experiments conducted on the VisDrone2019 dataset demonstrate that the average detection accuracy of the MASW-YOLO algorithm is 38.3%, which is augmented by 7.9% through the utilisation of the original YOLOv8n network. Furthermore, the number of network parameters is reduced by 19.6%.

Indexed as

AFPNDeep learningMSCA attentionSoft-NMSWise-IoUYOLOv8n

Identifiers

PMID40646143
PMCPMC12254372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.