Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646141›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A meta fusion model combining geographic data and twitter sentiment analysis for predicting accident severity.

Areeba Naseem Khan, Yaser Ali Shah, Wasiat Khan, Amaad Khalil, Jebran Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Areeba Naseem KhanDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Attock Campus, Attock, 43600, Pakistan.
Yaser Ali ShahDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS University Islamabad, Attock Campus, Attock, 43600, Pakistan.
Wasiat KhanDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Amaad KhalilDepartment of Computer Systems Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, 25000, Pakistan.
Jebran KhanDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Ajou University, Suwon, South Korea. jebran@ajou.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF5199991014091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, advancements in deep learning and real-time data processing have significantly enhanced traffic management and accident prediction capabilities. Building on these developments, this study introduces an innovative approach ConvoseqNet to improve traffic accident prediction by integrating traditional traffic data with real-time social media insights, specifically using geographic data and Twitter sentiment analysis. ConvoseqNet combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks in a sequential architecture, enabling it to effectively capture complex spatiotemporal patterns in traffic data. To further enhance prediction accuracy, a meta-model called MetaFusionNetwork is proposed, which combines predictions from ConvoseqNet and a Random Forest Classifier. Results show that ConvoseqNet alone achieved the highest predictive accuracy, demonstrating its capacity to capture diverse accident-related patterns. Additionally, MetaFusionNetwork's performance highlights the advantages of combining model outputs for better prediction. This research contributes to real-time data-driven traffic management by leveraging innovative data fusion techniques, improving prediction accuracy, and providing insights into model interpretability and computational efficiency. By addressing the challenges of integrating heterogeneous data sources, this approach presents a significant advancement in traffic accident prediction and safety enhancement.

Identifiers

PMID40646141
PMCPMC12254291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.