SynthesisScientific reports2025
Effects of stroboscopic visual training on reaction time and movement accuracy in collegiate athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of Integrated Sports Vision Training Batteries on Time- and Accuracy-Dependent Outcomes in Sport-Specific Tasks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Pooled it
- Stroboscopic training effects on athletic performance and cognitive function across populations, purposes, and skill types: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Pooled it
- Effects of stroboscopic visual training on reaction time and decision-making ability in athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- Integrating stroboscopic visual perturbation into a neuromuscular warm-up in adolescent male basketball players: effects on cognitive function, physical performance, and postural stability-a randomized controlled trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Acute biomechanical responses to stroboscopic vision during change-of-direction tasks in elite rugby athletes.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Stroboscopic visual training in basketball: a narrative review integrating cross-sport evidence and a hypothetical framework based on the information processing model.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Sports vision training reduces digital eye strain in screen-exposed university students: a randomized controlled trial of visuomotor and visual-attentional adaptation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Effects of stroboscopic vision training on visuomotor reaction and soccer-specific reactive agility in male collegiate soccer players: a randomized controlled intervention study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Review
- The effects of stroboscopic visual training on coordination, change-of-direction, and decision-making performance in collegiate basketball players.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Correlation between sports visual ability and catching performance in elite collegiate baseball infielders: a position-specific analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- The effects of stroboscopic vision training on physical performance in athletes: a systematic review.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- The effects of stroboscopic visual training on human cognitive function and motor performance: a systematic review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of stroboscopic training on sport-specific performance in collegiate athletes and examined the moderating influence of key training parameters. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects model was applied for the meta-analysis, with separate analyses conducted for time-based and accuracy-based performance measures. Subgroup analyses investigated the moderating effects of training duration, frequency, session length, strobe frequency, duty cycle, athlete age, and training experience. Twelve randomized controlled trials involving 415 athletes met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated that stroboscopic training had significant moderate effects on both time-based outcomes (SMD = -0.61, p = 0.045) and accuracy-based outcomes (SMD = 0.73, p < 0.01). Subgroup analyses suggested that training protocols lasting 6-10 weeks, with 2-3 sessions per week and 10-20 min per session, were more effective in enhancing overall athletic performance. In terms of strobe parameters, frequencies of 5-20 Hz and duty cycles of 50-70% and 10-50% were associated with greater improvements in accuracy-based and time-based outcomes, respectively. Furthermore, adolescent athletes (10-18 years) exhibited more substantial gains in time-based performance, while those with 4-8 years of training experience achieved the greatest overall improvements. Stroboscopic training effectively enhances sport-specific performance in collegiate athletes. Protocols of 6-10 weeks, incorporating 2-3 weekly sessions of 10-20 min and strobe frequencies of 5-20 Hz, appear to provide the most comprehensive benefits. Optimal duty cycles may differ depending on performance type-50-70% for time-based outcomes and 10-50% for accuracy-based outcomes. These findings offer preliminary guidance for the practical application of stroboscopic training in athletic populations. However, given the limitations in study quality and sample size, further research is warranted to identify the most effective training configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.