Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646137›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Effects of stroboscopic visual training on reaction time and movement accuracy in collegiate athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yuanyuan Luo, Yingying Cao, Xinliang Pan, Shuairan Li, Denise Koh, Yan Shi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effects of Integrated Sports Vision Training Batteries on Time- and Accuracy-Dependent Outcomes in Sport-Specific Tasks: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuanyuan LuoDazhou College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Dazhou, China.
Yingying Cao *School of Sports, Xi'an University, Xi'an, China.
Xinliang Pan *School of Physical Education, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an, China.
Shuairan Li *Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
Denise KohCentre for Community Education and Well-being, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia. Denise.koh@ukm.edu.my.
Yan ShiSchool of Sports, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of stroboscopic training on sport-specific performance in collegiate athletes and examined the moderating influence of key training parameters. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A random-effects model was applied for the meta-analysis, with separate analyses conducted for time-based and accuracy-based performance measures. Subgroup analyses investigated the moderating effects of training duration, frequency, session length, strobe frequency, duty cycle, athlete age, and training experience. Twelve randomized controlled trials involving 415 athletes met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated that stroboscopic training had significant moderate effects on both time-based outcomes (SMD = -0.61, p = 0.045) and accuracy-based outcomes (SMD = 0.73, p < 0.01). Subgroup analyses suggested that training protocols lasting 6-10 weeks, with 2-3 sessions per week and 10-20 min per session, were more effective in enhancing overall athletic performance. In terms of strobe parameters, frequencies of 5-20 Hz and duty cycles of 50-70% and 10-50% were associated with greater improvements in accuracy-based and time-based outcomes, respectively. Furthermore, adolescent athletes (10-18 years) exhibited more substantial gains in time-based performance, while those with 4-8 years of training experience achieved the greatest overall improvements. Stroboscopic training effectively enhances sport-specific performance in collegiate athletes. Protocols of 6-10 weeks, incorporating 2-3 weekly sessions of 10-20 min and strobe frequencies of 5-20 Hz, appear to provide the most comprehensive benefits. Optimal duty cycles may differ depending on performance type-50-70% for time-based outcomes and 10-50% for accuracy-based outcomes. These findings offer preliminary guidance for the practical application of stroboscopic training in athletic populations. However, given the limitations in study quality and sample size, further research is warranted to identify the most effective training configurations.

Indexed as

AthletesAthletic PerformanceReaction TimeStroboscopyAdolescentChildHumansMovementYoung AdultAccuracyAthletic performanceMeta-analysisReaction timeStroboscopic trainingVisual training

Identifiers

PMID40646137
PMCPMC12254360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.