ArticleScientific reports2025
Improved approaches to genotyping MAOA-uVNTR polymorphisms with novel allele discovery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Genetic Mosaic of Depression: Linking Polymorphisms to Neuroplasticity and Stress Regulation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Case Report: A possible novel adult-onset, progressive MAO-A hypofunction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A functional polymorphic 30 bp tandem repeat in the upstream regulatory region of the MAOA gene (MAOA-uVNTR) is extensively studied in relation to behavioral and neurobiological traits. The discrepancies of MAOA-uVNTR frequencies may be due to differences in racial and ethnic enrollment and methodologies for detecting alleles. This study aimed to enhance genotyping accuracy of MAOA-uVNTR polymorphisms by comparing conventional PCR and fluorescent PCR methods. Concordance analysis revealed 97.3% agreement (178/183). Discordant results were confirmed by Sanger sequencing, which validated the fluorescent PCR results but identified inaccuracies in conventional PCR findings. The study identified five common alleles (2.5R, 3.5R, 4.5R, 5.5R) and discovered a novel allele, 3.3R, through fluorescent PCR. Functional analysis using luciferase reporter vectors demonstrated 1.5-2.0 times higher transcriptional activity for the 3.3R and 4.5R alleles compared with 3.5R and 5.5R alleles in LA-N-5 and SK-N-SH cell lines. This emphasizes fluorescent PCR as a superior method for identifying MAOA-uVNTR polymorphisms, including novel alleles, with higher resolution and accuracy than conventional PCR. The approach eliminates the need for confirmatory sequencing of known alleles, providing time and cost efficiency. These findings support the use of fluorescent PCR as the preferred technique for accurate genotyping of MAOA-uVNTR and other tandem repeats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.