ArticleScientific reports2025
Use of fibres and surface treatment to improve the durability of concrete affected by sulphide mining.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this research is to evaluate solutions to improve the durability of structural concrete used in sulphide mining. This type of environment is one of the most aggressive conditions in which a concrete structure can be placed, with pH values below 3 and high sulphate contents. These environments cause significant degradation of metallic and structural materials, resulting in mass loss and alteration of mechanical properties, a process that is accelerated by the intervention of acidophilic bacteria. In this work it is proposed to reinforce the concrete by incorporating polypropylene fibres and silica fume and to protect the specimens by applying two types of surface materials, one polyurethane base and the other asphalt base. Several laboratory tests were carried out to evaluate the fundamental mechanical properties and durability of concrete, including tensile and compressive strength tests In addition, Slake tests were carried out to analyse the degradation of different fragments, water permeability tests and pressure sandblasting tests to measure the behaviour of the concrete against abrasion. The results confirm an increase in the tensile strength of fibre-reinforced concrete of about 8%, while the use of both types of surface materials has been shown a zero water penetration depth, while at the same time significantly improves the performance against impact degradation and abrasion with a reduction in weight loss that obtained in the reference samples with Slake test which is reduced to only 0.45% with surface treatment with polyurethane, 1.01% with asphaltic treatment and 2.48% with fibres, and even no weight loss in the sandblasting tests on the samples treated with asphalt material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.