ArticleScientific reports2025
Combination of machine learning and Raman spectroscopy for prediction of drug release in targeted drug delivery formulations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design of a multilayer photonic crystal biosensor for ocular studies enhanced with machine learning towards the evaluation of proliferative vitreoretinopathy.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrative ensemble learning framework for forecasting controlled drug release based on Raman spectral signatures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-enabled, QbD-aligned Predictive, and Sustainable Design of Natural Polymer-based Drug Delivery Systems.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Mechanism-aware and explainable artificial intelligence for drug release prediction in polymeric drug delivery systems.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this research, advanced regression techniques are investigated for modeling intricate release patterns utilizing a high-dimensional dataset comprising more than 1500 spectrum-based variables and categorical inputs. The spectral data are collected from Raman spectroscopy for analysis of drug release from a solid dosage formulation coated with Polysaccharides (a high-dimensional dataset of 155 samples, with drug release measured at 2, 8, and 24 h). The considered drug is 5-aminosalicylic acid for colonic drug delivery, and its release was estimated using Raman data as inputs along with other categorical parameters. The models, including Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR), Kernel-based Extreme Learning Machine (K-ELM), and Quantile Regression (QR) incorporate sophisticated approaches like the Sailfish Optimizer (SFO) for hyperparameter optimization and K-fold cross-validation to enhance predictive accuracy. Notably, KRR exhibited exceptional performance, achieving an R² of 0.997 on the training set and 0.992 on the test set, with a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.0004. In comparison, K-ELM and QR achieved lower R² values of 0.923 and 0.817 on the test set, respectively. The key innovation lies in integrating these non-linear regression models with robust data preprocessing steps, including dimensionality reduction via Principal Component Analysis (PCA), categorical feature encoding through Leave-One-Out (LOO), and outlier detection using Isolation Forest. This study significantly contributes by offering a comprehensive framework for managing high-dimensional and heterogeneous datasets, while emphasizing the effectiveness of optimization strategies in predictive modeling. By accurately predicting the release of 5-ASA from polysaccharide-coated formulations, these models can aid in the design of targeted colonic delivery formulations with optimized release kinetics, ultimately enhancing the efficacy of treatments for colonic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.