Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40646098›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Neural network based AI model for lung health assessment.

Umaisa Hassan, Amit Singhal, Gunjan Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Umaisa HassanNetaji Subhas University of Technology, Dwarka, Delhi, India.
Amit SinghalNetaji Subhas University of Technology, Dwarka, Delhi, India.
Gunjan GuptaCape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa. guptag@cput.ac.za.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treating pulmonary diseases is pivotal in healthcare since they are the third leading cause of mortality globally. To aid medical experts in diagnosis, various studies have been conducted using artificial intelligence (AI) compatible devices to analyze lung sounds recorded with a stethoscope. In this paper, four datasets have been considered as a combination of two public datasets to assess the performance of the proposed approach. The signals from each dataset undergo a series of pre-processing steps, encompassing normalization, re-sampling, and framing. Thereafter, eight sub-band filters have been taken into account to segregate distinct frequency bands. The sub-band signals are represented using characteristics such as entropy, [Formula: see text] norm, kurtosis, mean absolute deviation, and standard deviation. This characteristic representation for the signals is then fed to the proposed neural network (NN) for training and classification. The NN architecture consists of three fully connected layers and an output layer for classification. Our proposed approach attains 100% accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity, performing consistently well across all four datasets, which highlights the model's strong generalizability. The proposed architecture is simple, easy to realize, and has a short training time. The classification outcomes obtained through the proposed NN architecture demonstrate its superiority when compared to the existing methods.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLungLung DiseasesNeural Networks, ComputerRespiratory SoundsAlgorithmsHumansArtifical neural networkLung soundNeural networkPulmonary diseases

Identifiers

PMID40646098
PMCPMC12254253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.